RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable

May.09
RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
The Texas Supreme Court issued a case summary on May 8, 2026, describing its decision in Hancock v. RJR Vapor Co. LLC. The dispute centered on whether RJR Vapor’s VELO oral nicotine pouches are taxable as “tobacco products” under the Texas Tax Code. Lower courts had held that the pouches were not taxable tobacco products, but the Texas Supreme Court reversed, concluding that VELO pouches are taxable because they are made of “a tobacco substitute.”

Key Takeaways

  • The Texas Supreme Court issued a case summary for Hancock v. RJR Vapor Co. LLC on May 8, 2026.
  • The case concerned whether RJR Vapor’s VELO nicotine pouches are taxable as “tobacco products” under the Texas Tax Code.
  • The Texas Supreme Court reversed lower court rulings and held that VELO pouches are taxable tobacco products.
  • The Court concluded that VELO pouches are made of “a tobacco substitute.”
  • RJR Vapor’s constitutional challenges were remanded to the court of appeals.

2Firsts, May 9, 2026 

 

According to a case summary issued by the Texas Supreme Court, the Court held in Hancock v. RJR Vapor Co. LLC that RJR Vapor’s VELO oral nicotine pouches are taxable tobacco products under the Texas Tax Code.

 

The case concerned whether VELO pouches are subject to tobacco tax

 

The case summary said the dispute was a tax-refund case over whether RJR Vapor’s VELO pouches are taxable as “tobacco products” under the Tax Code.

 

RJR Vapor sells oral nicotine pouches that users place between the cheek and gum. 

 

When RJR Vapor introduced the pouches to the Texas market, it asked the Comptroller for a general information letter explaining whether the pouches were taxable under the Cigars and Tobacco Products Tax. 

 

The Comptroller concluded that the pouches were taxable. 

 

RJR paid the tax under protest and filed suit, seeking a refund and a declaration that the pouches are not taxable tobacco products.

 

Lower courts had sided with RJR Vapor

 

The case summary said RJR Vapor also challenged the constitutionality of the tax statute and its application. The trial court granted summary judgment for RJR, holding that the pouches were not taxable tobacco products. After a bench trial, the trial court ruled that the language of the Tax Code was unconstitutional both facially and as applied.

 

The court of appeals affirmed and held that the pouches are not taxable tobacco products, but did not reach the constitutional challenges.

 

Texas Supreme Court found VELO pouches taxable

 

The Texas Supreme Court reversed. In an opinion by Justice Busby, the Court concluded that VELO pouches are taxable tobacco products because they are made of “a tobacco substitute.”

 

The Court said the pouches’ blend of plant matter and nicotine takes the place and function of taxable pulverized tobacco in pouched tobacco products.

 

Constitutional challenges were remanded

 

The Texas Supreme Court remanded RJR Vapor’s constitutional challenges to the court of appeals.

 

The case summary also said Justice Sullivan concurred dubitante, expressing doubt as to whether the inclusion of plant matter in VELO pouches should inform the Court’s analysis.

 

Image Source: Texas Supreme Court

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Swedish-Founded Nicotine Pouch Retailer GotPouches Shifts to U.S.-Based Operations, Reaching Over 25 States
Swedish-Founded Nicotine Pouch Retailer GotPouches Shifts to U.S.-Based Operations, Reaching Over 25 States
Swedish-founded online nicotine pouch retailer GotPouches has completed the localization of its U.S. operations under UpNorth Retail LLC, with corporate operations in Franklin, Tennessee, domestic fulfillment from Nashville and U.S.-based customer support. The company says its catalog covers more than 20 nicotine pouch brands and it currently serves customers in more than 25 U.S. states.
Sep.18
Swedish Match Faces Broader Labeling Order After ZYN Inspection, Documents Obtained by 2Firsts Show
Swedish Match Faces Broader Labeling Order After ZYN Inspection, Documents Obtained by 2Firsts Show
Documents obtained by 2Firsts show that Sweden's Public Health Agency ordered Swedish Match to revise ingredient labels beyond the five ZYN products inspected. The dispute centers on whether flavoring ingredients must be individually disclosed, with Swedish Match citing trade-secret protection and the regulator insisting on full ingredient disclosure. The company faces a conditional penalty of SEK 2 million per month for noncompliance. As of October 22, the agency had received no appeal, despite the company's stated intention to challenge the decision.
Oct.22
Special Report | Russia Places Four JTI Businesses Under Temporary Management, a First for Tobacco Majors
Special Report | Russia Places Four JTI Businesses Under Temporary Management, a First for Tobacco Majors
Russia has placed shares in four Japan Tobacco International businesses under temporary management, the first such move involving a major global tobacco manufacturer, according to Interfax. JTI held 35.8% of Russia's tobacco market by volume in the first nine months of 2026. While British American Tobacco and Imperial Brands have exited Russia, Philip Morris International continues operating there. As the market changes and diplomatic efforts continue, could international tobacco companies that left Russia eventually return?
Nov.06
Special Report | Vape bans and tougher rules: the South Caucasus takes different paths
Special Report | Vape bans and tougher rules: the South Caucasus takes different paths
Azerbaijan's sweeping e-cigarette ban has raised concerns over enforcement errors and the emergence of illicit sales, while neighboring Armenia is tightening technical rules and preparing higher excise taxes. Georgia, meanwhile, has resisted calls for broader vape restrictions and introduced preferential taxes for some domestically produced cigarettes. The divergent approaches across the South Caucasus highlight a regional policy dilemma: how to curb nicotine use and protect public health without encouraging black markets or creating unintended economic consequences for businesses and consumers.
Nov.03
U.S. Rep. Krishnamoorthi Questions FDA Over Planned PMTA Rewrite, Seeks Communications With Altria and Reynolds
U.S. Rep. Krishnamoorthi Questions FDA Over Planned PMTA Rewrite, Seeks Communications With Altria and Reynolds
U.S. Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi on Oct. 6 questioned the FDA over its plan to reassess and potentially replace the 2021 PMTA regulatory framework, asking the agency to identify provisions it may change or eliminate, state whether current scientific evidentiary standards will be maintained, and disclose communications with Altria, Reynolds and other parties challenging the rule. Krishnamoorthi led a congressional investigation into JUUL and youth vaping in 2019 and has since remained active on e-cigarette regulation and enforcement.
Regulations
Oct.08
Product | Juul Labs Launches Upgraded JUUL2 Kit in UK With Four Pods at £9.99 and USB-C Charging
Product | Juul Labs Launches Upgraded JUUL2 Kit in UK With Four Pods at £9.99 and USB-C Charging
Juul Labs UK has introduced an upgraded JUUL2 Starter Kit for the UK market in October 2026, retaining a recommended retail price of £9.99 while doubling the number of included pods from two to four. The kit contains Crisp Menthol, Virginia Tobacco, Mango and Watermelon pods. The updated device replaces the previous proprietary charging dock with a USB-C port and offers longer battery life. The kit also features reduced packaging and retains a two-year limited warranty. Distribution is scheduled through major UK retailers, wholesalers, convenience stores and the JUUL UK website.
product
Oct.15