Texas Court to Hear LG Battery Explosion Injury Case

Feb.28.2023
Texas Court to Hear LG Battery Explosion Injury Case
LG Chemical faces US court jurisdiction dispute over exploding e-cigarette battery case in Texas court.

According to a Law360 report, the Supreme Court of Texas (referred to as "Texas" below) has agreed to hear a case against LG Chem and LG Chem America. The case involves an e-cigarette user who was injured due to an LG battery explosion. It will decide whether Texas courts have jurisdiction over LG Chem. LG Chem is headquartered in South Korea, with LG Chem America being its subsidiary.


The focus of this case is that the jurisdiction of the United States states is under the framework of federal law. States cannot exercise jurisdiction over judicial matters that do not belong to their state. LG Chemical's batteries are not directly distributed nationwide, so areas without direct distribution cannot exercise jurisdiction.


In 2016, Texan resident Tommy Morgan purchased an electronic cigarette which utilized an LG Chemical-manufactured 18650 lithium-ion battery. According to a lawsuit he filed in 2019 in Brazoria County Court, he claims that the battery in the e-cigarette exploded and caught fire unexpectedly, resulting in permanent injuries.


The company is also facing similar battery explosion lawsuits from Texas residents. However, the intermediate appeals court has come to a different conclusion regarding whether LG Chemical has sufficient contacts in the state to respond to the claims of victims, specifically regarding direct benefit from e-cigarette sales.


LG Chem USA and LG Chem assert that the Texas court lacks jurisdiction because these companies have not sold any individual batteries in Texas or sold directly to customers in the state.


LG Chem | Image Source: LG Chem Official Website.


It is understood that this is not the first time that LG Chemical has faced a similar lawsuit.


In Mississippi, the Dilworth couple has claimed that an electronic cigarette battery exploded while walking their dog, causing Mrs. Dilworth to suffer second and third degree burns. The battery was purchased separately from a local Mississippi e-cigarette store without any warnings or instructions.


The Dilworths have initiated a lawsuit including LG Chem, but it has encountered issues related to jurisdiction. LG Chem argued that Mississippi does not have personal jurisdiction over the company (see related article at the end), as it does not sell batteries for electronic cigarettes in Mississippi. The district court rejected the lawsuit filed by the Dilworths.


The Dilworth couple kept appealing and finally, on October 13th, 2022, the Mississippi Supreme Court ruled that they can sue LG Chem in Mississippi.


In Ohio, Paul Straight purchased an e-cigarette from a vape store which exploded, burning through his jeans and left thigh. He subsequently sued LG Chem. However, the Ohio court ruled in favor of LG, dismissing the case.


The state judge believed that LG Chem had confirmed that they had not received any revenue from the sale or distribution of 18650 batteries in Ohio, nor had they advertised or solicited business for these batteries in Ohio.


According to anonymous sources cited by 2FIRSTS, LG and Samsung have both been insisting that their batteries cannot be used in e-cigarette products. Additionally, LG's 18650 batteries are encased in steel and therefore intrinsically risky.


In fact, LG's significant market share in the e-cigarette battery market has given them extensive experience in dealing with lawsuits. According to Market.us' 2022 global e-cigarette lithium battery market segmentation percentage list, Korean company LG ranks fourth globally, with the top three being Samsung of Korea, Sony of Japan, and Matsushita.


According to a report from the legal news website Legal Newsline, LG Chem is currently facing at least 44 similar lawsuits across the United States as of October 2022. Despite this, LG Chem has maintained the same defense in each of these cases, arguing that their 18650 batteries were never intended for use in e-cigarettes or other inhalation devices.


Consumers, however, clearly do not agree with this argument. Morgan, who filed a lawsuit in the Texas High Court, stated that "LG Chemical deliberately shipped products to customers in Texas (which caused consumer burns), therefore Texas courts have jurisdiction.


Related reading:


LG Electronics has been acquitted after being accused in a case of battery explosion.


A South Korean electronic cigarette battery manufacturer has been sued in Mississippi, USA.


A court in Texas will hear a case concerning exploding batteries.


Further Reading:


Personal Jurisdiction refers to the interpretation of the law in the United States.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

IKE Tech Launches IKE 2.0 Compliance Platform for Nicotine Products
IKE Tech Launches IKE 2.0 Compliance Platform for Nicotine Products
IKE Tech launched IKE 2.0 on September 28, initially targeting nicotine products with a platform that combines user identity verification, product authentication, configurable policy controls and data analytics. Products can be authenticated through direct device integration or NFC smart tags. IKE Tech was formed with participation from Ispire's Aspire North America, Berify and Chemular, with Ispire currently holding a 40% interest. Its age-verification component PMTA was accepted by the FDA in 2025 and remains under review. The company did not disclose customer names, commercial deployment volumes, pricing or revenue tied to IKE 2.0.
News
Sep.29 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Snowplus Enters Japan’s FamilyMart Network With Zero-Nicotine NEO Line and Kishidan Campaign
Snowplus Enters Japan’s FamilyMart Network With Zero-Nicotine NEO Line and Kishidan Campaign
Snowplus distributor H&S said the zero-nicotine, zero-tar NEO vaping line will begin rolling out across FamilyMart stores in Japan from September 14, 2026, excluding some locations. The DASH line will also be sold at selected FamilyMart stores in southern Kyushu and Okinawa. Snowplus simultaneously named Japanese rock band Kishidan as a brand ambassador, combining convenience-store distribution with a broader consumer marketing push in Japan.
Sep.15
Special Report | Altria's NACS Booth Raises Questions Over U.S. Tobacco Advertising Warnings
Special Report | Altria's NACS Booth Raises Questions Over U.S. Tobacco Advertising Warnings
During its coverage of Altria's booth at NACS Show 2026, 2Firsts documented product displays that prompted questions about U.S. tobacco advertising warning requirements. Following public comments from a former FDA official, 2Firsts sought responses from Altria and independently consulted U.S. regulatory lawyer Azim Chowdhury. Altria maintained that its B2B communications complied with applicable laws, while Chowdhury explained that federal warning rules provide no general trade-show exemption for e-cigarettes and nicotine pouches. The special report examines the broader regulatory implications.
Nov.04
Juul Displays FDA-Authorized JUUL2, Highlights Age Verification at NACS Show 2026
Juul Displays FDA-Authorized JUUL2, Highlights Age Verification at NACS Show 2026
At the 2026 NACS Show in Las Vegas, Juul Labs displayed its JUUL2 e-cigarette system alongside existing products, age-verification messaging and mobile coupons, 2Firsts observed. The JUUL2 device and Virginia Tobacco and Polar Menthol pods received FDA marketing authorization in August 2026. Booth materials highlighted longer battery life, greater e-liquid capacity and connected-device features. A TruAge sign and a mobile coupon presentation also featured at the booth, with weekly offers available to age-verified adult nicotine consumers at participating retailers.
EXPO
Oct.09
NAS 2026 | FDA CTP Director Says PMTA Pathway Is “Predicated on Tobacco Harm Reduction”
NAS 2026 | FDA CTP Director Says PMTA Pathway Is “Predicated on Tobacco Harm Reduction”
At the 2026 New Approaches Summit in New York, FDA Center for Tobacco Products Director Bret Koplow said the PMTA pathway is “predicated on tobacco harm reduction.” He outlined four CTP priorities: youth prevention, helping adults quit or switch to lower-risk products, improving relative-risk communication, and reducing unauthorized products. Koplow also addressed flavored e-cigarettes, public risk perceptions, industry credibility and efforts to make PMTA reviews more efficient and predictable.
Sep.26
Virginia Tobacco Retail Permit Takes Effect October 1, Covering Vapes as More Than 3,000 Businesses Apply in September
Virginia Tobacco Retail Permit Takes Effect October 1, Covering Vapes as More Than 3,000 Businesses Apply in September
Virginia's new retail tobacco permit system took effect October 1, requiring sellers of vapes, nicotine products and related devices and accessories to obtain a Retail Tobacco Permit for each business location. Virginia ABC said more than 3,000 businesses applied in September alone, creating a processing backlog. Qualifying applicants that filed before October 1 may temporarily operate under a Letter of Authorization. The new store-level permit also sits alongside Virginia's existing vape product directory, where sales of unlisted liquid nicotine or nicotine vapor products can trigger civil penalties starting at $5,000.
Regulations
Oct.03