USITC: 337 Investigation towards Disposable Atomizer Devices, 36 Companies Involved

Regulations by 2FIRSTS, edited by Sophia Lv
Jul.18.2024
USITC: 337 Investigation towards Disposable Atomizer Devices, 36 Companies Involved
USITC votes to investigate certain disposable atomizers, alleging patent infringement by 36 defendants including Breeze Smoke and Vapeonly Technology.

On July 17th, the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) voted to initiate an investigation into certain disposable atomization devices. The products involved in the investigation are detailed in the committee's investigation notice.

 

This survey is based on the complaints filed by RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc., RJ Reynolds Vapor Company, RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company, and RAI Services Company, all based in Winston-Salem, North Carolina on June 11, 2024. Supplementary complaints were filed on June 12, 2024, and July 1, 2024.

 

It is worth noting that the mentioned companies, RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc., R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, and RAI Services Company, are all subsidiaries of Reynolds American Inc. (RAI).

 

A supplementary appeal alleges that the United States violated Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 by importing and selling certain disposable atomizer devices that infringe upon a patent claimed by the appellant. The appellant is requesting the U.S. International Trade Commission to issue a general exclusion order or limited exclusion order, as well as a cease and desist order.

 

The United States International Trade Commission has identified the defendants in this investigation, totaling 36 in total.

 

  • Breeze Smoke LLC, West Bloomfield, MI 
  • Dongguan (Shenzhen) Shikai Technology Co., Ltd., Guangdong Province, China 
  • Vapeonly Technology Co. Ltd., San Po Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong 
  • iMiracle (Shenzhen) Technology Co. Ltd., Luohu District, Shenzhen, China
  • Guangdong Qisitech Co., Ltd., Dongguan, Guangdong Province, China
  • Fewo Intelligent Manufacturing Ltd., Dongguan City, Guangdong Province, China
  • Nevera (HK) Ltd., San Po Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong
  • Guangdong Cellular Workshop Electronics Technology Co., Ltd, 
  • Dongguan City, Guangdong Province, China
  • Wonder Ladies Ltd., Tortola, British Virgin Islands
  • Sailing South Ltd., Tortola, British Virgin Islands
  • Marea Morada Ltd., Tortola, British Virgin Islands
  • Social Brands, LLC, Dallas, TX
  • Zhuhai Qisitech Co., Ltd., Zhuhai, Guangdong Province, China
  • Shenzhen Han Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China
  • Palma Terra Ltd., Tortola, British Virgin Islands
  • Shenzhen IVPS Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China
  • Heaven Gifts International Ltd., San Po Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong
  • Maduro Distributors d/b/a The Loon, Minneapolis, MN
  • Bidi Vapor, LLC, Orlando, FL
  • Kimsun Technology (HuiZhou) Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China 
  • Shenzhen Yanyang Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China
  • Pastel Cartel, LLC, Austin, TX
  • American Vape Company, LLC, Pflugerville, TX
  • Affiliated Imports, LLC, Austin, TX
  • Shenzhen LC Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China
  • LCF Labs, Inc., Ontario, CA
  • Shenzhen Kangvpe Technology Co., Ltd., Bao’an District, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China
  • Flumgio Technology Ltd., Tuen Mun, N.T., Hong Kong
  • Shenzhen Pingray Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China
  • SV3, LLC d/b/a Mi-One Brands, Phoenix, AZ
  • Price Point Distributors Inc. d/b/a Price Point NY, Farmingdale, NY
  • Flawless Vape Shop Inc, Anaheim, CA
  • Flawless Vape Wholesale & Distribution Inc., Anaheim, CA
  • TheSy, LLC d/b/a Element Vape, Alhambra, CA
  • VICA Trading Inc. d/b/a Vapesourcing, Tustin, CA

 

Through the initiation of this investigation (337-TA-1410), the United States International Trade Commission has not made any substantive decisions on the case. The Chief Administrative Law Judge of the United States International Trade Commission will assign the case to an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), who will arrange and conduct an evidentiary hearing. The ALJ will issue an initial determination on whether there is a violation of Section 337; this initial determination will be subject to review by the Commission.

 

The United States International Trade Commission will soon make a final determination on the investigation. Within 45 days of the start of the investigation, the United States International Trade Commission will set a target date for completion of the investigation. Remedial orders for Section 337 cases issued by the United States International Trade Commission will take effect upon publication and become final within 60 days of publication, unless the US Trade Representative rejects approval within the 60-day deadline for policy reasons.

 

337 investigation

 

Section 337 investigation is a type of investigation conducted by the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Its main goal is to address unfair import practices, especially those involving the infringement of United States intellectual property, including patents, trademarks, and copyrights.

 

Initiate investigation:

 

337 investigations are typically initiated by patent holders or other interested parties in the United States. After receiving a complaint, the USITC will decide within 30 days whether to launch an investigation. If an investigation is initiated, the USITC will appoint an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) to oversee the case and establish a timetable and rules for the investigation.

 

Investigation process:

 

During the investigation, administrative judges will hold an evidentiary hearing where both parties can submit evidence, question witnesses, and present arguments. The administrative judges will then issue a preliminary ruling to determine if there has been a violation of Section 337. The preliminary ruling will be reviewed by the USITC.

 

Judgement and Remedial Measures:

 

If the USITC determines that there is a violation of Section 337, it can issue an Exclusion Order prohibiting the import of infringing products. In addition, it can also issue a Cease and Desist Order, prohibiting the sale of these products in the United States.

 

The exclusion order is divided into a General Exclusion Order and a Limited Exclusion Order. The former applies to all infringing products, while the latter only applies to specific defendants or specific products.

 

Difference between federal courts

 

No Damages: The USITC cannot award damages like a federal court, but can issue exclusion orders more quickly. Tight Schedule: Processing times for 337 investigations are typically shorter, usually completed within 12 to 15 months.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

UK HMRC Launches Vape Duty Stamps on October 1, Ushering in Supply-Chain Traceability as Chinese Exporters Face New Compliance Hurdles
UK HMRC Launches Vape Duty Stamps on October 1, Ushering in Supply-Chain Traceability as Chinese Exporters Face New Compliance Hurdles
HM Revenue & Customs put the UK's Vaping Products Duty and Vaping Duty Stamps Scheme into effect on October 1. All vaping liquids manufactured in or imported into the UK are now subject to duty at £2.20 per 10ml, regardless of nicotine content. The stamp regime will introduce digital functionality designed to provide traceability throughout the supply chain, with approved manufacturers, importers and warehousekeepers required to report product movements and retailers and consumers eventually able to scan stamps to verify authenticity. China exported $177 million of vape-related products to the UK in August, up 51.4% year over year, increasing the significance of the new compliance regime for China's Shenzhen-centered vape supply chain.
Regulations
Oct.04
Swedish Match Faces Broader Labeling Order After ZYN Inspection, Documents Obtained by 2Firsts Show
Swedish Match Faces Broader Labeling Order After ZYN Inspection, Documents Obtained by 2Firsts Show
Documents obtained by 2Firsts show that Sweden's Public Health Agency ordered Swedish Match to revise ingredient labels beyond the five ZYN products inspected. The dispute centers on whether flavoring ingredients must be individually disclosed, with Swedish Match citing trade-secret protection and the regulator insisting on full ingredient disclosure. The company faces a conditional penalty of SEK 2 million per month for noncompliance. As of October 22, the agency had received no appeal, despite the company's stated intention to challenge the decision.
Oct.22
On-Site Report | After FDA Announces Review of PMTA Framework, CTP Director Details Reform Priorities
On-Site Report | After FDA Announces Review of PMTA Framework, CTP Director Details Reform Priorities
FDA CTP Director Bret Koplow used his FDLI keynote in Washington to outline how the agency is rethinking the PMTA framework. He discussed category-specific review, nicotine pouch and sPMTA pilots, AI-assisted review, a 70% reduction in pending applications, and a major staffing constraint: CTP currently has only nine scientific review teams. He also reaffirmed tobacco harm reduction while stressing youth protection, flavored products, risk communication, and the challenge of unauthorized e-cigarettes.
Regulations
Oct.06
IVG Parent Secures HMRC Excise Warehouse and Duty Stamp Approvals Ahead of UK Vape Tax
IVG Parent Secures HMRC Excise Warehouse and Duty Stamp Approvals Ahead of UK Vape Tax
Acme Vape Ltd, the company behind UK vaping brand IVG, has received HM Revenue & Customs approval to operate an excise warehouse for vaping products and participate in the Vaping Duty Stamps Scheme. The UK's Vaping Products Duty will take effect on October 1, 2026, at a flat rate of £2.20 per 10ml of vaping liquid. Acme Vape Ltd says its approved warehouse in Preston will become operational under the new regime on the same date.
Regulations
Sep.18 by 2Firsts Perspectives
2Firsts Hosts China Market Forum at InterTabac as Global Industry Attention to China’s Tobacco Sector Deepens
2Firsts Hosts China Market Forum at InterTabac as Global Industry Attention to China’s Tobacco Sector Deepens
On September 16, 2Firsts hosted a China-focused industry forum during InterTabac in Dortmund, bringing together more than 30 participants from North America, Europe, India, South Korea and other markets. The session covered traditional tobacco, next-generation products, exports, technology, regulation and supply chains, while examining how China’s tobacco sector operates, where its transformation may be heading, and why its growing role matters increasingly to companies across the global tobacco and nicotine industry.
Sep.21
Product | PIXL Adds 6ml PIXL 5K in UK Alongside 12ml PIXL 8000 as Vape Duty Takes Effect
Product | PIXL Adds 6ml PIXL 5K in UK Alongside 12ml PIXL 8000 as Vape Duty Takes Effect
Vaping brand PIXL has introduced the PIXL 5K reusable prefilled pod device in the UK, featuring a 2ml prefilled pod and a 4ml refill container with a combined e-liquid capacity of 6ml. The device uses 20mg/ml nicotine salt e-liquid and is advertised to deliver up to approximately 5,000 puffs. Available through UK retailers by August 2026, the PIXL 5K sits alongside the existing 12ml PIXL 8000. The UK's Vaping Products Duty took effect on October 1 at £0.22 per millilitre, producing theoretical duty amounts of £1.32 and £2.64 for the two products' respective full refill sets.
product
Oct.10