BAT’s Vuse E-Cigarettes Accused of Misleading Carbon-Neutral Claims in U.S. Class Action Lawsuit

Jun.05.2025
British American Tobacco (BAT) and its subsidiary RJ Reynolds are facing a class action lawsuit in California over claims that their Vuse e-cigarette brand misled consumers with false carbon-neutral marketing. Vuse was promoted as “the world’s first carbon-neutral vape brand,” but many of the carbon credits used were found to have no real climate benefit. Consumers are seeking $5 million in damages.

Key Points:

 

1.British American Tobacco is facing a $5 million class-action lawsuit accused of false advertising.

 

2.The lawsuit focuses on the sustainability marketing claims of the Vuse e-cigarette.

 

3.The investigation report alleges that its carbon-neutral status relies on carbon credits that provide no substantial environmental benefits.

 

4.Consumers claim they were misled into choosing Vuse products.

 


 

According to a recent report by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, British American Tobacco (BAT) has been accused of falsely promoting its e-cigarette brand Vuse as carbon neutral. Consumers have filed a class-action lawsuit in the Northern District Court of California, seeking $5 million in compensation. The lawsuit alleges that Vuse was marketed as the "world's first global carbon neutral vape brand," but these environmental claims are said to have been achieved through carbon credits that did not result in any actual environmental improvements.

 

The lawsuit states that Reynolds Tobacco (RJ Reynolds), a subsidiary of British American Tobacco, is also named as a defendant. Consumers chose Vuse because they believed in its carbon-neutral promise, and the complaint details how the product was advertised as carbon-neutral. The lawsuit also mentions a document from British American Tobacco, in which the company views its environmental qualifications as a means to "enhance consumer engagement and brand loyalty.

 

According to the lawsuit, British American Tobacco continued to market the Vuse e-cigarette product as carbon neutral even after learning of false credits. More than one-third of the credits used to offset Vuse emissions came from the Guanaré Forest Plantations Project in Uruguay.

 

The project is an eucalyptus tree farm in Uruguay that was rated zero by an independent rating agency in 2022. This means that the carbon credits that were supposed to represent a ton of emission reductions or removals have actually had no effect.

 

The lawsuit alleges that this farm and three other forestry projects found to have overstated their sustainability claims occupy the majority of the credit allocation required for Vuse to be declared carbon neutral.

 

The court found that companies making environmental claims in marketing must diligently substantiate those claims, and that British American Tobacco and its subsidiaries failed to fulfill these obligations.

 

A spokesperson for British American Tobacco stated in November 2024 that the "carbon neutral" claim had been independently verified in 2021, and all advertising materials related to carbon neutrality for Vuse were discontinued in December 2023. A press release from 2021 referred to Vuse as the "world's first carbon neutral e-cigarette," which can still be found on the British American Tobacco website.

 

BAT’s Vuse E-Cigarettes Accused of Misleading Carbon-Neutral Claims in U.S. Class Action Lawsuit
BAT Press Release | Image Source: BAT

 

 

 

 

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
The Texas Supreme Court issued a case summary on May 8, 2026, describing its decision in Hancock v. RJR Vapor Co. LLC. The dispute centered on whether RJR Vapor’s VELO oral nicotine pouches are taxable as “tobacco products” under the Texas Tax Code. Lower courts had held that the pouches were not taxable tobacco products, but the Texas Supreme Court reversed, concluding that VELO pouches are taxable because they are made of “a tobacco substitute.”
May.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
FDA Wins Default Entry in Case Against E-Cigarette Distributor, to Seek Permanent Injunction
FDA Wins Default Entry in Case Against E-Cigarette Distributor, to Seek Permanent Injunction
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has made procedural progress in its lawsuit against North Carolina-based e-cigarette distributor Dream Distro LLC and its owner. A federal district judge granted the government’s request for entry of default after the defendants failed to respond to the complaint within 21 days of service. The government will next seek a default judgment, including a permanent injunction.
Apr.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Spain’s Nicotine Pouch Sales Reached 5 Million Cans in 2025, Industry Says 2026 Could Hit 8 Million
Spain’s Nicotine Pouch Sales Reached 5 Million Cans in 2025, Industry Says 2026 Could Hit 8 Million
Spain’s Nicotine Pouch Association said nicotine pouch sales in Spain reached 5 million cans of 20 units in 2025 and are expected to rise 60% to 8 million in 2026. The group said there are currently 20 to 30 brands on the Spanish market and called for regulation proportionate to product risk. It also opposed a proposal to reduce nicotine content to 0.99 mg per pouch, saying it would amount to a de facto ban on the category.
Mar.19 by 2FIRSTS.ai
FDA Filing Shows RIF Notices for 229 CTP Employees Were Largely Rescinded
FDA Filing Shows RIF Notices for 229 CTP Employees Were Largely Rescinded
A court declaration signed by FDA official Melanie M. Keller on March 24, 2026 detailed the status of previously issued reduction-in-force notices affecting employees at the Center for Tobacco Products (CTP).
Apr.01 by 2FIRSTS.ai
New York’s Lawsuit Against Puff Bar and Other Flavored Vape Companies Survives Key Court Challenge
New York’s Lawsuit Against Puff Bar and Other Flavored Vape Companies Survives Key Court Challenge
According to Law360, a federal judge ruled that makers and distributors of flavored vape brands such as Puff Bar cannot escape New York’s lawsuit seeking to hold them responsible for the youth vaping epidemic. The court found that the state had adequately alleged the companies misrepresented how safe vaping is.
Apr.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai
More Than 500 Stores in Russia’s Nizhny Novgorod Region Voluntarily Stop Selling Vapes
More Than 500 Stores in Russia’s Nizhny Novgorod Region Voluntarily Stop Selling Vapes
According to the Nizhny Novgorod regional government, 550 stores in the region have voluntarily removed vapes and e-liquids from their product assortments. Regional officials said a public offer encouraging businesses to self-restrict vape sales has been in place since September 2025, and that a large retail chain with more than 40 outlets in Nizhny Novgorod joined the initiative. The regional government also said a federal ban on vape sales is expected in the near future.
Apr.15 by 2FIRSTS.ai