Exclusive: Suspected ‘Backend Update Then Withdrawal’ Suggests Glas May Be Next FDA-Authorized E-Cigarette Brand After Juul

Regulations
Dec.21.2025
Exclusive: Suspected ‘Backend Update Then Withdrawal’ Suggests Glas May Be Next FDA-Authorized E-Cigarette Brand After Juul
An exclusive 2Firsts investigation found an unpublished FDA update on e-cigarette marketing authorizations that mirrors market speculation, suggesting Glas’s application may have cleared internal review, though no official confirmation has been issued.

Key Points:

  • A screenshot circulating on X suggests that Glas may have received FDA marketing authorization for one e-cigarette device and five pods, though no official announcement has been made.

 

  • 2Firsts identified a December 2025–dated e-cigarette authorization list on the FDA website, but the products are not yet listed in the FDA’s searchable database and some links remain inaccessible.

 

  • If confirmed, this would be the first new FDA e-cigarette authorization since Juul in July 2025, potentially signaling a faster pace in PMTA decision-making.

 

2Firsts, December 21, 2025, Shenzhen-2Firsts observed in the early hours of December 21, 2025 (Beijing time) that X user Gregory Conley posted a screenshot indicating that one device and five e-cigarette pods produced by e-cigarette brand Glas had received Marketing Granted Orders (MGOs) from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

 

Exclusive: Suspected ‘Backend Update Then Withdrawal’ Suggests Glas May Be Next FDA-Authorized E-Cigarette Brand After Juul
A post shared by X user Gregory Conley|Image Source:X

 

 

Exclusive: Suspected ‘Backend Update Then Withdrawal’ Suggests Glas May Be Next FDA-Authorized E-Cigarette Brand After Juul
A list circulating online showing Glas products purportedly receiving marketing authorization | Source: social media

 

 

In subsequent verification efforts, 2Firsts identified a file on the FDA website labeled as an “e-cigarette authorization list” updated in December 2025, the contents of which appear highly consistent with the screenshot shared on X. However, the Glas products referenced have not yet appeared in the FDA’s official Searchable Tobacco Products Database, and some related file links are currently inaccessible, leaving the authorization status unconfirmed by formal FDA announcement.

If officially confirmed, this would mark the first new FDA e-cigarette authorization since Juul products received MGOs in July 2025, and may coincide with signs of shifting momentum in the FDA’s PMTA review process.

 

 

FDA Database Does Not Yet List Glas Products

 

Following the disclosure on X, 2Firsts promptly checked the FDA’s Searchable Tobacco Products Database. As of publication, no e-cigarette products associated with Glas are listed in the database.

 

The database continues to show 39 authorized e-cigarette products in total, with the most recent confirmed authorization granted to Juul in July 2025.

 

Exclusive: Suspected ‘Backend Update Then Withdrawal’ Suggests Glas May Be Next FDA-Authorized E-Cigarette Brand After Juul
2Firsts searched the FDA’s official database and found no Glas products listed

 

 

FDA File Status Appears Irregular; “December Update” List Not Formally Published

 

According to the FDA document link provided by the X user (https://www.fda.gov/media/190229/download), 2Firsts found that the page is no longer accessible and returns a “Page Not Found” error, preventing direct verification of the file via that link.

 

Exclusive: Suspected ‘Backend Update Then Withdrawal’ Suggests Glas May Be Next FDA-Authorized E-Cigarette Brand After Juul
FDA file numbered 190229 could not be accessed

 

 

In further searches, 2Firsts used Google to search for ““Glas Inc.” CTP-250” and found search results indicating that a PDF file hosted on the FDA website contains references to products including “Glas Inc. BLONDE TOBACCO 50 MG/ML Pod,” “CLASSIC MENTHOL 50 MG/ML Pod,” and “FRESH,” though the file itself could not be opened.

 

Exclusive: Suspected ‘Backend Update Then Withdrawal’ Suggests Glas May Be Next FDA-Authorized E-Cigarette Brand After Juul
Google search results indicate that a PDF file hosted on the FDA website contains references to Glas

 

 

By following the FDA’s typical public document numbering patterns, 2Firsts identified a neighboring link (https://www.fda.gov/media/190230/download), which leads to a low-resolution image file titled “Authorized-E-Cigarettes-List.jpg.” While the image is blurred and lacks full clarity, its layout and visible entries appear consistent with the screenshot circulated on X, and the list includes “Glas Inc.” and associated products.

 

Exclusive: Suspected ‘Backend Update Then Withdrawal’ Suggests Glas May Be Next FDA-Authorized E-Cigarette Brand After Juul
2Firsts identified a file numbered 190230 on the FDA website which, though blurred, appears consistent with the authorization document circulating online | Source: FDA website

 

 

Possible Indication FDA Review Is Complete, Pending Formal Announcement

 

Based on these observations, one possible explanation is that the FDA has completed its internal review and authorization process for Glas-related e-cigarette products and uploaded an updated authorization list internally, but that the document has not yet entered the formal public release process or was temporarily removed during publication. Technical or caching factors may have resulted in a residual image version remaining accessible on the server.

 

As of now, the FDA has not issued any public statement regarding the status of the file or the authorization of Glas products.

 

 

If Confirmed, Authorization May Signal Regulatory Shift on Flavor and Age Verification

 

According to the circulating authorization list screenshot, Glas’s approved products appear to include at least one flavor that, based on its name, does not fall under traditional tobacco or menthol categories.

 

Previous media reports have indicated that Glas’s PMTA strategy centered on its proprietary age-restriction or age-verification platform, designed to address FDA concerns regarding youth access. If the authorization is ultimately confirmed, this could represent the first FDA-approved e-cigarette products combining age-verification technology with non-traditional flavors—an outcome that could be viewed as a significant regulatory development in the U.S. e-cigarette market.

 

 

Signs of Accelerating PMTA Review Pace

 

On December 19, 2025 (U.S. Eastern Time), the FDA announced that it had granted marketing authorization to certain on! PLUS nicotine pouch products under Altria.

 

If Glas’s e-cigarette authorization is confirmed, it would further reinforce market perceptions that the FDA is accelerating PMTA decision-making across both e-cigarette and nicotine pouch categories.

 

2Firsts has submitted an interview request to the FDA regarding the authorization status of Glas’s e-cigarette products and the apparent publication and removal of related documents. No response had been received as of publication.

 

2Firsts will continue to monitor and report on developments in U.S. PMTA reviews and regulatory policy.


Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore and four authorized U.S. CCELL distributors are asking a California federal court to permanently dismiss a core antitrust claim brought by direct purchasers. Plaintiffs allege that Smoore coordinated minimum wholesale prices, customer allocation and limits on price competition among distributors, amounting to a per se unlawful horizontal conspiracy. The defendants say the alleged conduct reflects ordinary vertical relationships between a manufacturer and its distributors. The court previously dismissed a similar claim, and the latest dispute centers on whether the second amended complaint adds sufficient facts to establish a horizontal agreement.
Sep.14
NAS 2026 | Former FDA Tobacco Chief Mitch Zeller Calls for Shift From “End Game” to “End State”
NAS 2026 | Former FDA Tobacco Chief Mitch Zeller Calls for Shift From “End Game” to “End State”
At the 2026 New Approaches Summit in New York, former FDA Center for Tobacco Products Director Mitch Zeller called for the tobacco harm reduction debate to shift from the traditional “end game” toward defining a desired “end state.” He also highlighted unresolved concerns around dual use, argued that biomarkers of exposure may be more meaningful than cigarettes-per-day in assessing risk reduction, and said nicotine misperceptions remain a major barrier to public health progress.
Sep.25
Canada Health Minister Says She Is Not Considering Looser Nicotine Pouch Retail Rules as PMI-Linked Group Pushes for Wider Access
Canada Health Minister Says She Is Not Considering Looser Nicotine Pouch Retail Rules as PMI-Linked Group Pushes for Wider Access
Canadian Health Minister Marjorie Michel says she is not considering loosening retail restrictions on nicotine pouches. Canada regulates pouches containing 4 mg or less of nicotine per unit as non-prescription nicotine replacement therapy and requires newer NRT formats such as pouches to be sold from behind pharmacy counters. Meanwhile, Unsmoke Canada, linked to Philip Morris International's Canadian business, is pushing to allow pouches in convenience stores and other general retail outlets. Health Canada also acknowledges continued unauthorized sales, while recent research shows rising pouch use among Canadian youth aged 16 to 19.
Sep.24
Russia’s Vape Device Labeling Regime Enters Force: Registration Starts in September, Mandatory Coding in December
Russia’s Vape Device Labeling Regime Enters Force: Registration Starts in September, Mandatory Coding in December
Russia's digital labeling regime for reusable e-cigarettes and similar personal vaping devices entered its first mandatory phase in September 2026. From September 1, manufacturers, importers and other market participants must register with the national Chestny ZNAK tracking system. From December 1, newly manufactured and imported covered devices will be required to carry digital identification codes and be reported as entering circulation. Russia has also issued new operational guidance for imports, marking the transition from a voluntary pilot to phased mandatory implementation.
Sep.15
Germany's Four-Year Tobacco Tax Plan Heads to Parliament as BAT, JTI and PMI Push for Changes
Germany's Four-Year Tobacco Tax Plan Heads to Parliament as BAT, JTI and PMI Push for Changes
Germany's parliament is scheduled to hold a first reading of amendments to the Tobacco Tax Act on September 24. The government plans annual tax increases from 2027 through 2030 covering cigarettes, heated tobacco, vaping liquids and other categories. It expects the reform to generate €756 million in additional revenue in 2027, rising to €3.589 billion in additional annual revenue by 2030. Ahead of the parliamentary debate, the German Association of the Tobacco Industry and Novel Products, or BVTE, launched the "Tabaksteuer mit Augenmaß" campaign backed by BAT, JTI, Philip Morris, Reemtsma and wholesale and retail groups.
Sep.23
Reynolds Seeks to Join Altria Lawsuit Challenging FDA PMTA Rule and Calculation of 180-Day Deadline
Reynolds Seeks to Join Altria Lawsuit Challenging FDA PMTA Rule and Calculation of 180-Day Deadline
Three R.J. Reynolds companies are seeking to intervene in a lawsuit filed by Altria subsidiaries Helix Innovations and NJOY challenging the FDA's 2021 PMTA final rule. The companies dispute how the agency uses Acceptance and Filing reviews and completeness determinations to establish when the Tobacco Control Act's 180-day decision period begins. Reynolds has also linked prolonged PMTA reviews to competition from unauthorized vaping products. The FDA, meanwhile, has been accelerating reviews and reducing its backlog.
Sep.14