"Lost Mary" Again Blocks Similar Trademark in the UK: “Love Mary” Found Likely to Cause Confusion

Aug.21.2025
"Lost Mary" Again Blocks Similar Trademark in the UK: “Love Mary” Found Likely to Cause Confusion
The UK Intellectual Property Office has rejected Shenzhen Sendao Technology Co., Ltd.’s application to register the “Love Mary” trademark, siding with iMiracle (HK) Ltd., the owner of “Lost Mary.” The ruling determined that “Love Mary” was highly similar to “Lost Mary,” likely to mislead consumers, and risked damaging iMiracle’s established reputation and interests in the UK market.

 

Key Points:

 

Case Background:

  • Plaintiff (opponent): iMiracle (HK) Ltd. – owner of the “Lost Mary” brand.
  • Defendant (applicant): Shenzhen Sendao Technology Co., Ltd. – applied in 2022 to register the “Love Mary” trademark, covering e-cigarettes and related products.
  • iMiracle argued that “Love Mary” was too similar to “Lost Mary,” likely to confuse consumers.

 

Main Dispute:

  • The central issue was whether “Love Mary” would cause marketplace confusion.
  • iMiracle accused Sendao of attempting to exploit the reputation of “Lost Mary” through similarities in name, packaging, and typeface.
  • Sendao argued that “Love” and “Lost” conveyed different concepts sufficient for distinction.

 

Ruling:

  • The UK Intellectual Property Office ruled to reject Sendao’s “Love Mary” application, finding that it carried a risk of misleading consumers and potentially harming iMiracle’s reputation.
  • The decision emphasized that iMiracle had built strong market recognition and sales for “Lost Mary” in the UK since 2022, warranting legal protection.

 


 

According to a report by Law360 on August 20, the maker of the well-known disposable vape brand Lost Mary successfully won its case to block a competitor’s attempt to register the “Love Mary” trademark, on the grounds that it could mislead consumers into buying lookalike products.

 

“Love Mary” Trademark Rejected Due to High Risk of Confusion with “Lost Mary”

 

“A significant portion of consumers who have previously come into contact with the earlier mark are likely to fail to notice the differences, despite the conceptual distinction between ‘love’ and ‘lost,’” wrote hearing officer Rosie Le Breton in the ruling.

 

In 2022, Shenzhen Sendao Technology Co., Ltd. applied to register the “Love Mary” trademark for e-cigarettes, related tobacco products, filters, and lighters. iMiracle (also the manufacturer of the popular Elf Bar vapes) opposed the application, arguing that shoppers would confuse the two brands. The decision, dated August 11 and now made public, upheld iMiracle’s opposition.

 

The hearing officer noted that iMiracle had been selling e-cigarettes under the “Lost Mary” mark since March 2022 and that there was “no doubt” the company enjoyed significant market reputation.

 

The ruling further highlighted that in the seven months leading up to Sendao’s October 2022 application, iMiracle’s monthly revenue rose dramatically from £1 million (about US$1.3 million) to over £9 million.

 

The officer also found that Shenzhen Sendao Technology Co., Ltd.’s products used packaging and typeface similar to iMiracle’s, suggesting an intent to deceive consumers into mistakenly purchasing rival products.

 

Such conduct created an obvious risk of reputational harm to iMiracle, as dissatisfied customers might wrongly attribute negative experiences with Sendao’s products to iMiracle.

 

Moreover, the officer determined that the marks were very similar in appearance and sound, covering identical or highly similar products, and that both conveyed overlapping concepts since each referenced a character named “Mary.”

 

Even if some consumers noticed the difference between “Love” and “Lost,” a significant proportion would still be indirectly confused, perceiving the two as alternative product ranges from the same company.

 

The case was registered as O/0747/25 under trademark number 3841865, with Shenzhen Sendao Technology Co., Ltd. as applicant and iMiracle (HK) Ltd. as opponent.

 

Both iMiracle and Shenzhen Sendao Technology Co., Ltd. have not yet issued public comments on the ruling.

 

Comparison chart of Love Mary and Love Mary products | Chart made by: 2Firsts

 

iMiracle’s Continued Trademark Enforcement: Lawsuit Against “Found Mary”

 

This is not iMiracle’s first trademark defense in the UK market. The company previously sued Vapes-Bars Ltd., alleging that its “Found Mary” disposable vapes copied the appearance, name, and colors of “Lost Mary” to gain unfair advantage.

 

In August 2023, iMiracle filed a lawsuit against the UK-based brand Found Mary, arguing that its products were nearly identical to Lost Mary, infringing on iMiracle’s trademark rights.

 

iMiracle sought a court order to prohibit Vapes-Bars, the company behind Found Mary, from selling any e-cigarettes under the “Found Mary” brand in the UK and from misrepresenting its business as being connected to iMiracle.

 

At the time, Vapes-Bars claimed it had filed applications for five trademarks under the Found Mary name. iMiracle responded that it had already lodged oppositions or invalidity proceedings against all five.

 

 

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

China’s E-cigarette Exports Reach $1.694 Billion in Jan–Feb 2026; U.S., UK, Germany Lead, Japan Rises to Fourth
China’s E-cigarette Exports Reach $1.694 Billion in Jan–Feb 2026; U.S., UK, Germany Lead, Japan Rises to Fourth
China Customs Administration released e-cigarette export data for January and February 2025, showing varied monthly performances in 2026.In January, the export value was $940 million, a decrease of 6.2% compared to January 2025's $1.02 billion. In February, the export value was $754 million, a 51.2% increase compared to February 2025's $498 million.
Mar.20 by 2FIRSTS.ai
2Firsts|Sesh Advances Nicotine Pouch PMTA to Filing Stage, Experts Highlight Regulatory Threshold and Market Window
2Firsts|Sesh Advances Nicotine Pouch PMTA to Filing Stage, Experts Highlight Regulatory Threshold and Market Window
Sesh said its Premarket Tobacco Product Application (PMTA) for 64 nicotine pouch SKUs has been accepted by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and advanced to the Filing stage, entering substantive scientific review. Industry experts say the development signals that the application has crossed a key technical and regulatory threshold, while also highlighting growing divergence in regulatory capability and market positioning within the nicotine pouch category.
Special Report
Mar.24 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Imperial Tobacco Canada Responds to Anti-Smoking Groups on Youth Vaping
Imperial Tobacco Canada Responds to Anti-Smoking Groups on Youth Vaping
Imperial Tobacco Canada responded to the April 17 press conference by anti-smoking groups by calling for a more focused, fact-based discussion on youth vaping that targets the illicit market. The company said youth should not be using nicotine products and that it supports strong measures to prevent youth access, but argued that the discussion failed to clearly distinguish between the regulated market and the illicit market that is driving youth access.
Apr.22 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Netherlands Plans Law to Ban Possession of Large Quantities of Vapes Intended for Trade
Netherlands Plans Law to Ban Possession of Large Quantities of Vapes Intended for Trade
Dutch Health Minister Hermans is drafting legislation that would also ban possession of larger quantities of vapes, allowing the Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority to intervene earlier and seize stock before proving that trade has taken place.
Apr.13 by 2FIRSTS.ai
German Environment Minister Plans Bill to Ban Disposable E-Cigarettes This Year
German Environment Minister Plans Bill to Ban Disposable E-Cigarettes This Year
German Federal Environment Minister Carsten Schneider said he is preparing legislation to ban disposable e-cigarettes and will present a bill this year. Industry data estimated that legal e-cigarette sales in Germany rose by about one quarter in 2025 to €2.4 billion. Refillable devices are not expected to be affected by the ban.
May.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Imperial Brands Pulls myblu Vape Business From U.S., Citing Prolonged FDA Approval Process
Imperial Brands Pulls myblu Vape Business From U.S., Citing Prolonged FDA Approval Process
Imperial Brands said it will phase out its myblu vaping business in the United States, citing prolonged FDA approval timelines for new vape products. The company said it will instead focus on modern oral nicotine products in the U.S., including the expansion of its Zone brand and new flavors. While overall next-generation product revenue continued to grow, revenue from the category in the Americas declined sharply.
May.12