Korean Government Plans to Regulate Synthetic Nicotine E-cigarettes

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
May.11.2024
Korean Government Plans to Regulate Synthetic Nicotine E-cigarettes
South Korea plans to revise laws to regulate synthetic nicotine e-cigarettes amid concerns over environmental impact and health.

According to South Korean media "NEWS 1," the South Korean Food and Drug Safety Ministry is conducting ingredient analysis on "synthetic nicotine liquid e-cigarettes" and plans to amend relevant laws to strengthen health regulations. Currently, regular cigarettes using natural plant extracts and liquid e-cigarettes containing natural nicotine are subject to multiple regulations by the government. However, e-cigarettes made with synthetic nicotine, a chemical substance, have not been within the scope of regulation as they do not fall under the category of traditional cigarettes.

 

According to reports, the environmental pollution management of synthetic nicotine e-cigarettes is severely lacking, leading to serious environmental issues. Since 2015, the environmental department has been collecting a waste disposal fee of 24.4 Korean won per pack of conventional cigarettes, generating approximately 850 billion won in government revenue. In contrast, a single product of liquid e-cigarette using natural nicotine only needs to pay a environmental tax of 1.2 Korean won, which is only 1/20 of the fee for conventional cigarettes, sparking criticism of the unfairness of this regulation.

 

Tobacco industry personnel pointed out that there are many issues with the regulations on liquid e-cigarettes. For example, the amount of nicotine in a single e-cigarette and the size of the plastic container used are almost the same, but taxes are calculated based on individual e-cigarettes, leading to inaccuracies in the environmental impact calculation.

 

At the same time, current regulations have not clearly defined which category synthetic nicotine liquid e-cigarettes belong to, leading to tax issues in their treatment.

 

Industry professionals say that synthetic nicotine e-cigarettes will eventually be completely phased out, with the majority being disposable. There is a significant difference between them and traditional cigarettes. They involve the direct disposal of products containing plastic, lithium batteries, and chemicals, causing a greater environmental impact. The government has not taken any action on this issue, which is seen as a major management failure.

 

Current regulations have no specific guidelines for the disposal of disposable liquid e-cigarettes, leaving consumers unable to properly dispose of them. Oftentimes, consumers will simply throw them into regular trash bins. However, this can pose a fire hazard if disposed of with flammable waste.

 

Currently, other countries are increasingly tightening regulations on disposable liquid e-cigarettes. In the United States, the sale of most disposable liquid e-cigarettes has already been banned. According to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 4.5 disposable liquid e-cigarettes are discarded every second in the US, prompting the government to further strengthen regulation. France also passed a law banning the sale of disposable e-cigarettes in November last year.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
The Texas Supreme Court issued a case summary on May 8, 2026, describing its decision in Hancock v. RJR Vapor Co. LLC. The dispute centered on whether RJR Vapor’s VELO oral nicotine pouches are taxable as “tobacco products” under the Texas Tax Code. Lower courts had held that the pouches were not taxable tobacco products, but the Texas Supreme Court reversed, concluding that VELO pouches are taxable because they are made of “a tobacco substitute.”
May.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Swedish Politicians Ask European Commission to Clarify Legality of France’s Nicotine Pouch Ban
Swedish Politicians Ask European Commission to Clarify Legality of France’s Nicotine Pouch Ban
France’s ban on oral nicotine pouches has triggered an immediate response in Sweden. Swedish Minister for Foreign Trade Benjamin Dousa said Sweden had mobilized strongly against the ban and argued that it constitutes a clear obstacle to the free movement of goods within the EU single market. Swedish officials say the measure affects a strategically important domestic industry and conflicts with Sweden’s harm-reduction approach to public health.
Apr.14 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Nicokick and zone Extend NASCAR Collaboration for April 19 Kansas City Race
Nicokick and zone Extend NASCAR Collaboration for April 19 Kansas City Race
Nicokick.com said it will continue its collaboration with zone for a second year at the April 19 NASCAR race in Kansas City, appearing on Richard Childress Racing’s No. 8 Chevrolet driven by Kyle Busch. The 2026 race-weekend campaign for verified adult nicotine consumers aged 21 and older includes the exclusive launch of zone Cranberry and a limited-edition five-flavor mix pack selected by Busch.
Apr.16 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Netherlands Plans Law to Ban Possession of Large Quantities of Vapes Intended for Trade
Netherlands Plans Law to Ban Possession of Large Quantities of Vapes Intended for Trade
Dutch Health Minister Hermans is drafting legislation that would also ban possession of larger quantities of vapes, allowing the Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority to intervene earlier and seize stock before proving that trade has taken place.
Apr.13 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Belgium Calls for EU-Wide Limits on Vape Ingredients and Ban on Disposable E-Cigarettes
Belgium Calls for EU-Wide Limits on Vape Ingredients and Ban on Disposable E-Cigarettes
Belgian Health Minister Frank Vandenbroucke has called on the European Union to take stronger action on vaping, saying it is becoming an “epidemic” and accusing the industry of targeting young people.
Mar.26 by 2FIRSTS.ai
New York’s Lawsuit Against Puff Bar and Other Flavored Vape Companies Survives Key Court Challenge
New York’s Lawsuit Against Puff Bar and Other Flavored Vape Companies Survives Key Court Challenge
According to Law360, a federal judge ruled that makers and distributors of flavored vape brands such as Puff Bar cannot escape New York’s lawsuit seeking to hold them responsible for the youth vaping epidemic. The court found that the state had adequately alleged the companies misrepresented how safe vaping is.
Apr.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai