Statement Regarding Patent Dispute: FirstUnion Technology's Legal Victory

Oct.16.2024
Statement Regarding Patent Dispute: FirstUnion Technology's Legal Victory
Shenzhen FirstUnion Technology Co., Ltd. issues statement on patent infringement case, urging industry cooperation for sustainable development.

Editor's note: The following content is reproduced from the official website of FirstUnion Technology Co., Ltd. The two parties only aim to disseminate information within the industry, and do not assume any direct or joint responsibility for this statement. Readers should conduct their own risk assessment when quoting the information below.

Statement Regarding Patent Dispute: FirstUnion Technology's Legal Victory
FirstUnion Technology releases a statement regarding the "patent infringement" case | Image source: FirstUnion Technology Official Website


On October 15, 2024, FirstUnion Technology Co., Ltd. in Shenzhen city issued a statement on its official website.


The following is the original statement:


Statement


On September 14, 2024, the Intermediate People's Court of Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province, issued a verdict in case No. (2024) Yue 03 Min Chu 3835, confirming that the IVG2400 electronic atomization product produced by Shenzhen FirstUnion Technology Co., Ltd. (referred to as "our company") does not infringe on the utility model patent rights of Dongguan Kangrunte Industrial Co., Ltd. (referred to as Kangrunte Company) with patent number ZL202320854370.6 (entitled "A Separable Multi-Pod E-cigarette"). The verdict has now taken effect. At the same time, our company is filing a lawsuit against Kangrunte Company and related parties for their unfair competition behavior, seeking legal action and compensation for related losses.


Previously, Kangrunte Company had filed a complaint with the Shenzhen Market Supervision Administration (hereinafter referred to as the "Market Supervision Bureau") alleging that our production of the IVG2400 electronic atomization product infringed upon its patent rights. At the same time, some media outlets published inaccurate reports on the matter, which were widely circulated, causing serious damage to our company's reputation and operations. Therefore, we had to file a lawsuit with the Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court to confirm that we did not infringe on any rights, in order to protect our legitimate interests.


Here, we kindly remind rights holders to strictly abide by laws and regulations when protecting their intellectual property rights, and not to maliciously mislead the public in order to avoid disrupting or obstructing the normal operation of the market.


Our company always adheres to independent innovation, values and respects the legitimate and compliant use of intellectual property rights. At the same time, we also call on all parties in the industry to maintain fair competition and jointly promote the healthy and sustainable development of the industry.


Shenzhen FirstUnion Technology Co., Ltd.


October 15, 2024


On November 10, 2023, FirstUnion Technology Co., Ltd. in Shenzhen issued a statement regarding the online complaint of "patent infringement", which was reposted by two major news outlets.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Inside Nicotine-Pouch M&A Through Imperial's Yoik Deal: Latham, KPMG, PwC, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley Form the Adviser Lineup
Inside Nicotine-Pouch M&A Through Imperial's Yoik Deal: Latham, KPMG, PwC, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley Form the Adviser Lineup
Imperial Brands' acquisition of Swedish Helwit owner Yoik Group AB has highlighted the professional-services firms supporting cross-border oral nicotine M&A. Latham & Watkins and KPMG advised Imperial, while PwC and TM & Partners advised Yoik. KPMG also appeared on Imperial's acquisition of Black Buffalo earlier in 2026, while PwC played an extensive role in KT&G's acquisition of Swedish nicotine-pouch company Another Snus Factory. Imperial's public disclosures put the global modern oral nicotine delivery market at approximately £8.8 billion in retail sales and 23.5 billion pouches in 2024
Sep.20
German Bundestag Passes Tobacco Tax Hikes: Vape Liquid Duty to Reach €0.44/ml, Heated Tobacco Taxes to Rise and Cigarettes Seen Near €12 a Pack
German Bundestag Passes Tobacco Tax Hikes: Vape Liquid Duty to Reach €0.44/ml, Heated Tobacco Taxes to Rise and Cigarettes Seen Near €12 a Pack
Germany's Bundestag passed amendments to the Tobacco Tax Act on October 15, 2026, setting out annual excise tax increases from 2027 through 2030 for e-cigarette liquids, heated tobacco, cigarettes and other tobacco products. Under the Finance Committee's amended bill, duty on qualifying e-liquids will rise from €0.32/ml in 2026 to €0.44/ml in 2030, an increase of 37.5%. Heated tobacco will retain its tax calculation based on 80% of the corresponding cigarette excise duty. The average price of a 20-cigarette pack is projected to approach €12 by 2030, with some brands potentially reaching €14. The legislation is projected to generate approximately €11.8 billion in additional tax revenue over four years and remains subject to further legislative procedures.
Regulations
Oct.19
GAO Audit Finds Nearly 132,000 FDA Tobacco Applications Waiting an Average 1,266 Days as Nicotine Pouch Pilot Practices Move Into Vape PMTA Reviews
GAO Audit Finds Nearly 132,000 FDA Tobacco Applications Waiting an Average 1,266 Days as Nicotine Pouch Pilot Practices Move Into Vape PMTA Reviews
A U.S. Government Accountability Office audit found that 131,915 tobacco product applications submitted to the FDA since 2018 remained without a final review as of December 31, 2025, with pending applications waiting an average of 1,266 days. GAO also found FDA lacks the data needed to systematically determine whether scientific reviews meet applicable timelines. HHS agreed to upgrade the agency's tracking systems. At the same time, FDA has begun applying lessons from its nicotine pouch PMTA pilot to e-cigarette reviews, while changes to enforcement policy and electronic submissions are making the specific stage of a PMTA increasingly relevant to market access.
FDA
Oct.03
Product | SMOORE's VAPORESSO Introduces VAST Refillable Vape With Three Resistances in One Pod
Product | SMOORE's VAPORESSO Introduces VAST Refillable Vape With Three Resistances in One Pod
SMOORE-owned vaping brand VAPORESSO introduced the VAST refillable open-system vape in October 2026, featuring Tri-Core Mesh technology that integrates three resistance configurations—0.8Ω, 0.6Ω and 0.4Ω—within a single pod. The device supports different operating modes and e-liquid types. The standard version features a 10mL pod, while a TPD-labelled configuration combines a 2mL pod with an 8mL refill container. The device has a 1,600mAh battery and a maximum output of 30W. VAPORESSO claims up to six pod refills and a tested coil lifespan of up to 150,000 puffs. The UK's MHRA published a related device notification on October 12. The official MSRP is $25.90, compared with a $35.90 listing on VAPORESSO's direct store.
product
Oct.30
Product | PMI Launches ZYN Melts in UK, Extending ZYN Beyond Nicotine Pouches Into Dissolvable Tablets
Product | PMI Launches ZYN Melts in UK, Extending ZYN Beyond Nicotine Pouches Into Dissolvable Tablets
Philip Morris International (PMI) has launched ZYN Melts in the UK, introducing a fully dissolvable oral nicotine tablet format alongside the brand's existing nicotine pouches. The range includes Cool Mint and Peppermint, each offered at 1mg and 2mg of nicotine per tablet, creating four SKUs. Each can contains 20 tablets and is priced at £6.50 in the UK. Unlike ZYN nicotine pouches, Melts are placed between the upper lip and gum and dissolve completely during use.
News
Sep.29 by 2Firsts Perspectives
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
Private antitrust litigation stemming from Altria's 2018 $12.8 billion investment for a 35% economic interest in JUUL is advancing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Direct purchasers, indirect purchasers and indirect resellers of JUUL products filed answering briefs this week seeking to preserve class certifications granted by a California federal court in February. Altria and JUUL argue that individual consumers and large distributors differ too much in purchasing terms to remain in a single direct-purchaser class, while a separate dispute concerns whether California antitrust law can apply to indirect purchasers across 27 jurisdictions. A September trial has been put on hold during the appeal.
Sep.23