KT&G Wins Lawsuit Against Journalist Over Unfair Reporting

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Dec.19.2023
KT&G Wins Lawsuit Against Journalist Over Unfair Reporting
KT&G wins lawsuit against journalist accusing its subsidiary of unfair acquisition; Supreme Court dismisses appeal.

According to a report from South Korean news outlet Newsway, tobacco company KT&G has achieved a final victory in a lawsuit filed by a journalist and other media outlets regarding alleged unfair practices during the acquisition process of its subsidiary. The case has gone through two trials before this ultimate triumph.

 

Legal experts have revealed that on November 30th, the Supreme Court's First Civil Division upheld a decision to dismiss the appeal brought by KT&G against Kang Jin-gu, a former journalist of "Kyung-Hyang Shinmun," for damages.

 

The concept of non-acceptance of appeals refers to the system in which the Supreme Court dismisses appeals without reviewing the case.

 

Previously, on February 26, 2020, Kang published an article titled "KT&G Accused of Concealing New Drug Toxicity and Coercive Unfair Mergers" in "京乡新闻" magazine.

 

An article alleges that KT&G suppressed the toxicological test results of its subsidiary, KT&G Life Science Company, and manipulated the merger ratio by inflating the enterprise value during the merger with its subsidiary Yongjin Pharmaceutical in 2016.

 

The article also claims that KT&G Life Science Company has an illicit undisclosed agreement, whereby if the initial public offering of the merger case fails, compensation will be provided to investors of KT&G Life Science Company. Additionally, the CEO of the progressive pharmaceutical company opposing the merger was dismissed and replaced by someone from the headquarters of KT&G.

 

KT&G has filed a lawsuit seeking damages against Kang and others, alleging that their statements are false and have harmed the company's public perception.

 

In August 2022, the initial court recognized the public interest of the report but ruled that there was no reason to believe Jiang's claims of undisclosed agreements and concealed toxicity tests were true. The court also supported KT&G's view, stating that the report not only failed to raise any doubts but also used conclusory language to defame KT&G, and the opposing views were not adequately countered.

 

In the second trial held in July of this year, the court stated that the content in the article written by former journalist Mr. Kang, including claims of "reaching agreements with investors," "unfair dismissal of management executives," and "concealing genetic toxicity," were found to be false. The initial ruling was deemed justified, and therefore, the defendant's appeal was dismissed on grounds of lack of merit.

 

On November 30th, the Supreme Court unreasonably rejected the case, bringing an end to the 3-year, 10-month long litigation with KT&G emerging as the ultimate victor.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

How Investors Are Repricing the Global Tobacco Industry as Nicotine Markets Shift
How Investors Are Repricing the Global Tobacco Industry as Nicotine Markets Shift
How are investors reassessing the global tobacco industry as nicotine markets evolve? In an interview with 2Firsts, Charlie Chen, Head of Research at CCB International Securities, forecasts annual growth of 30–50% for nicotine pouches, outpacing vaping and heated tobacco. He examines how regulatory enforcement, shifting market shares and new business models are influencing company valuations. The report also explores differences between multinational tobacco groups and Chinese companies, drawing on insights from the New Approaches Summit on profitability, investment strategies and industry consolidation.
Nov.11
South Korea Fully Reviews Nicotine-Analog and Nicotine-Free Vape Liquid Imports, With Over 99% From China and Chinese Supply-Chain Documents Under Scrutiny
South Korea Fully Reviews Nicotine-Analog and Nicotine-Free Vape Liquid Imports, With Over 99% From China and Chinese Supply-Chain Documents Under Scrutiny
Korea Customs Service has tightened import controls on nicotine-analog and nicotine-free e-cigarette liquids, placing the products under 100% document review and subjecting all e-cigarette liquid import declarations to pre-clearance ingredient analysis. As of September 20, 2026, South Korea had imported about 15 metric tons of nicotine-analog liquids, 99.99% from China, and about 316 metric tons of nicotine-free liquids, including roughly 315 metric tons, or 99.7%, from China. The measures follow South Korea's April expansion of its tobacco definition to include synthetic nicotine products and include new checks on Chinese manufacturing, transaction and export documentation.
Sep.24
UK-Listed Consumer Goods Group Supreme Sees Vape Duty as Potential Consolidation Opportunity, Holds FY27 Outlook
UK-Listed Consumer Goods Group Supreme Sees Vape Duty as Potential Consolidation Opportunity, Holds FY27 Outlook
UK-listed consumer goods group Supreme plc says it continues to expect FY27 trading to meet market expectations as the Vaping Products Duty takes effect on October 1, while maintaining a comparatively positive view of the new tax and compliance regime. Supreme has said the framework could increase compliance complexity for smaller operators and contribute to market consolidation, while its manufacturing, compliance and distribution scale may allow it to gain share. Its 88Vape brand will retain its value positioning.
Sep.18
Pennsylvania Vape Directory Enforcement Starts Oct. 19, Barring Retail Sales of Unlisted Products
Pennsylvania Vape Directory Enforcement Starts Oct. 19, Barring Retail Sales of Unlisted Products
Pennsylvania's Act 57 vape directory regime will reach the end of its 120-day inventory transition period on Oct. 19. Nicotine-containing e-cigarettes intended for retail sale in the state that are not listed on the Attorney General's ENDS directory will then be barred from retail sale and treated as contraband subject to seizure, forfeiture and destruction. Manufacturers face annual product certification, brand- and style-based fees and a minimum $50,000 surety bond, while retailers and wholesalers must source through licensed channels and monitor the directory.
Regulations
Oct.08
GAO Audit Finds Nearly 132,000 FDA Tobacco Applications Waiting an Average 1,266 Days as Nicotine Pouch Pilot Practices Move Into Vape PMTA Reviews
GAO Audit Finds Nearly 132,000 FDA Tobacco Applications Waiting an Average 1,266 Days as Nicotine Pouch Pilot Practices Move Into Vape PMTA Reviews
A U.S. Government Accountability Office audit found that 131,915 tobacco product applications submitted to the FDA since 2018 remained without a final review as of December 31, 2025, with pending applications waiting an average of 1,266 days. GAO also found FDA lacks the data needed to systematically determine whether scientific reviews meet applicable timelines. HHS agreed to upgrade the agency's tracking systems. At the same time, FDA has begun applying lessons from its nicotine pouch PMTA pilot to e-cigarette reviews, while changes to enforcement policy and electronic submissions are making the specific stage of a PMTA increasingly relevant to market access.
FDA
Oct.03
US ITC Judge Finds Glas Infringed Two JUUL Vape Patents, Recommends Restrictions on Related Imports——Glas Received FDA Marketing Authorization for Four Vape Pods in May 2026; Proposed Restrictions Remain Under Commission Review
US ITC Judge Finds Glas Infringed Two JUUL Vape Patents, Recommends Restrictions on Related Imports——Glas Received FDA Marketing Authorization for Four Vape Pods in May 2026; Proposed Restrictions Remain Under Commission Review
A U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) administrative law judge issued an initial determination on October 20, 2026, finding that certain Glas vaping devices, cartridges and components infringed 12 claims across two patents asserted by JUUL, constituting a violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The judge recommended a limited exclusion order and a cease and desist order against the Glas respondents. Five months earlier, the FDA authorized four Glas e-cigarette pods, including mango, blueberry and two menthol variants. The patent investigation concerns device and cartridge structures and is separate from FDA premarket review. The proposed import restrictions have not become final, and their product-level scope remains unresolved.
company
Nov.05