Controversy Surrounding E-cigarette Regulation in South Dakota Legislature

Feb.11
Controversy Surrounding E-cigarette Regulation in South Dakota Legislature
South Dakota bill requires e-cigarette sellers to be certified, causing controversy among legislators and industry stakeholders.

According to Keloland's report on February 6th, a bill aimed at regulating e-cigarette products in South Dakota has been approved by the House Health and Human Services Committee. The bill passed with a 7-5 vote and has now been submitted for consideration by the full house.


House Bill 1069 mandates that e-cigarette product retailers in the state must obtain certification from the manufacturer of the e-cigarette product they are selling or providing. Additionally, individuals must register with the state's Department of Revenue before retailing e-cigarette products. If an individual owns or operates multiple retail locations, each location must be registered separately.


If e-cigarette products that do not meet certification requirements are found in the state, they should be treated as contraband and properly disposed of. Any distributor selling or distributing uncertified e-cigarette products within the state will be convicted of a Class 2 misdemeanor. Republican lawmaker Brian Mulder stated that the bill aims to crack down on illegal products, clean up the e-cigarette industry, and eliminate unauthorized products.


The South Dakota Retailers for Better Alternatives is opposed to the bill. Jordan Mason believes that the legislation proposes unconstitutional restrictions, severely impacts small businesses, and threatens public health.


Kurt Kadlik, vice president of the South Dakota Retailers Association, pointed out that manufacturers in other states have sued the FDA due to the PMTA process. He believes that this regulation will consume the state's limited resources to enforce an FDA regulatory scheme that a court has deemed illegal, ultimately leading to the closure of hundreds of businesses in South Dakota.


Mason stated that if the bill is passed, it will give the major tobacco companies a dominant position in the South Dakota market. He mentioned that out of the 26 million applications in the FDA's PMTA process, only 23 have been approved, and all of these products are owned by the major tobacco companies.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

The U.S. FDA has issued two notices: seeking public comments on regulations regarding tobacco retailer training programs and sales restrictions
The U.S. FDA has issued two notices: seeking public comments on regulations regarding tobacco retailer training programs and sales restrictions
On August 22, the U.S. FDA issued two notices soliciting public comments on regulations regarding tobacco retailer training programs and restrictions on tobacco sales. Both notices provide a 60-day public comment period under the Paperwork Reduction Act, aiming to protect public health, especially that of children and adolescents, by regulating retailer behavior and restricting tobacco sales.
Aug.22 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Malta Health Authority Issues Warning on Nicotine Pouches, Plans Inclusion in Future Tobacco Control Strategy
Malta Health Authority Issues Warning on Nicotine Pouches, Plans Inclusion in Future Tobacco Control Strategy
Malta’s health authorities warn of the dangers of nicotine pouches as several European countries initiate bans.
Jul.08
Brazil's Paraná Police Seize $4,000 Worth of E-cigarettes; Shop Accused of Selling to Teenagers
Brazil's Paraná Police Seize $4,000 Worth of E-cigarettes; Shop Accused of Selling to Teenagers
Police in Paraná, Brazil, seized about $4,000 worth of e-cigarettes from a shop near a school in Cascavel, accused of selling to teens. E-cigarette sales are banned nationwide under Anvisa Resolution No. 855/2024.
Jul.28 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Product|E-cigarettes Draw Inspiration from Heated Tobacco Designs as Multiple Brands Launch Open Systems Similar to IQOS Iluma
Product|E-cigarettes Draw Inspiration from Heated Tobacco Designs as Multiple Brands Launch Open Systems Similar to IQOS Iluma
Recently, several e-cigarette brands have launched magnetic open-system devices with designs resembling heated tobacco products like IQOS Iluma. Some of these products are already on the market, while others remain in the demonstration phase, reflecting a new wave of evolution in industry structural design and user experience.
Jul.16 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Retraction Statement Regarding the Article: “2Firsts Investigation | U.S. Tightens E-Cigarette Enforcement, Disrupting China Air Shipments — Industry Estimates $78 Million in Goods Seized in Six Months”
Retraction Statement Regarding the Article: “2Firsts Investigation | U.S. Tightens E-Cigarette Enforcement, Disrupting China Air Shipments — Industry Estimates $78 Million in Goods Seized in Six Months”
Retraction Statement.
Jul.15
EU Rejects “Royal Smoke” Trademark Application Over Similarity to BAT’s “Royals”
EU Rejects “Royal Smoke” Trademark Application Over Similarity to BAT’s “Royals”
The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) Opposition Division has rejected Latvian company Baltic Trade Solutions’ application for the “Royal Smoke” trademark, intended for use on e-cigarettes and related products. The decision found the mark too similar to British American Tobacco’s “Royals” cigarette brand, creating a likelihood that average consumers would mistakenly believe the two are connected. Both marks cover products within the “smokers’ articles” category.
Aug.14 by 2FIRSTS.ai