Louisiana Releases VAPE List, to Remove Unauthorized Products from March 18

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Mar.13.2024
Louisiana Releases VAPE List, to Remove Unauthorized Products from March 18
Louisiana to resume enforcing e-cigarette sales laws in 2024, requiring FDA-approved products only. Law previously challenged but now upheld.

According to a report by the American news station KPLC, the Louisiana Office of Alcohol and Tobacco Control (ATC) has announced that laws regulating the marketing and sales of e-cigarette products will be reinstated on March 18, 2024.

 

The office will publicly release a V.A.P.E. list on its official website, listing all e-cigarette or alternative nicotine products approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Since the law has taken effect, all unapproved e-cigarette products within the state of Louisiana cannot be legally sold, and retailers are required to remove products that are not included on this list.

 

Previously, the implementation of the law was suspended due to a lawsuit filed by the Louisiana convenience store and e-cigarette association, claiming that the law violated the constitution. However, following a permanent injunction hearing on February 21, 2024, the ATC stated that the court deemed the injunction no longer applicable, and the e-cigarette law can now be enforced.

 

Initially, in June 2023, the ATC passed a bill to triple the e-cigarette tax in Louisiana and ban the sale of e-cigarette products not approved by the FDA. The additional tax revenue is expected to be allocated to departments such as the state police.

 

This tax increase stems from Bill 414, HB635, which was signed into law by former Governor John Bel Edwards.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Six Years of Data Show FDA Clearing PMTA Backlog
Six Years of Data Show FDA Clearing PMTA Backlog
FDA data from FY2020 to FY2025 show how the PMTA system for e-cigarette products evolved after an early surge of submissions created prolonged front-end delays. Millions of applications accumulated at the Acceptance stage before entering substantive review. Since 2023, the number of applications pending acceptance has declined sharply, and industry participants report shorter initial decision timelines in late 2025.
Feb.06
Special Report|Reynolds’ 337 Patent Case Ends, but a Harsher 337 Compliance Battle Now Targets the Entire Vape Supply Chain
Special Report|Reynolds’ 337 Patent Case Ends, but a Harsher 337 Compliance Battle Now Targets the Entire Vape Supply Chain
The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has terminated Investigation 337-TA-1410 after invalidating key vape patent claims asserted by R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, removing the immediate risk of import bans for dozens of companies. However, a new case—337-TA-1486—has already opened a more consequential legal front, shifting the focus from patent disputes to regulatory compliance across the vape supply chain, including PACT Act reporting, tax compliance, and FDA marketing authorization.
BAT
Mar.11
Poland Weighs Ban on Disposable Vapes, Tightens Rules on Nicotine Pouches
Poland Weighs Ban on Disposable Vapes, Tightens Rules on Nicotine Pouches
Poland plans to amend its tobacco control legislation, proposing a ban on disposable e-cigarettes (both nicotine-containing and nicotine-free) while simultaneously tightening regulations on nicotine pouches and other novel nicotine products. Nicotine pouches may be permitted only in "tobacco flavour" variants to reduce their appeal to young people.
Mar.10 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Fontem Sues FDA Over Refusal-to-File Decision for Nicotine Pouch PMTAs
Fontem Sues FDA Over Refusal-to-File Decision for Nicotine Pouch PMTAs
According to a complaint filed on March 17 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fontem US, LLC and Texas retailer OM Investment, LLC sued the Food and Drug Administration and the Department of Health and Human Services over FDA’s refusal-to-file decision for certain Zone nicotine pouch PMTAs.
Mar.19 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Surrey councillor calls for tougher vape sales controls, seeking the “most restrictive legally supportable” package
Surrey councillor calls for tougher vape sales controls, seeking the “most restrictive legally supportable” package
Surrey Councillor Gordon Hepner presented a notice of motion calling on council to “wage war on vaping” by strengthening controls on the sale of vaping products in the city, citing vaping as a “serious health concern,” especially among youth. Hepner said the motion directs staff to bring back the “most restrictive legally supportable” package from the City’s 2019 bylaw work to materially reduce where and how vape products can be sold, including licensing controls and enforcement.
Feb.10 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Pakistan Senate health panel weighs possible vape ban
Pakistan Senate health panel weighs possible vape ban
Sources say Pakistan’s Senate Standing Committee on Health is deliberating whether to impose a ban on vaping products, after holding a meeting on the health implications of vaping and the rising use of e-cigarettes nationwide.
Mar.04 by 2FIRSTS.ai