Florida Governor Faces Decision on Disposable Flavor Ban Bill

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Mar.08.2024
Florida Governor Faces Decision on Disposable Flavor Ban Bill
Florida Politics reported that Florida bans disposable e-cigarette flavors, but allows refillable devices and e-liquids. Governor Ron DeSantis must now decide the fate of the bill.

According to reports from Floridapolitics, the state of Florida has banned the sale of disposable flavored e-cigarettes but allows the sale of refillable devices and e-liquid. Governor Ron DeSantis now has the option to sign the bill into law, let it become law without his signature, or veto it. If passed, the bill would go into effect on October 1st of this year.

 

The HB 1007 bill, known for its strict modifications, will deliver a fatal blow to disposable, colorful, and flavorful e-cigarette products. However, reusable devices and e-liquids are explicitly stated to not be included in the restrictions of the bill, meaning that e-cigarette enthusiasts, especially adults, can continue their habit without much hindrance or limitation. "This completely exempts, I quote, the 'open system' of e-cigarette shops," said Toby Overdorf, a partner at Palm City Pollution Control Agency.

 

In a stark contrast to the original version of HB 1007, proposed by partners Toby Overdorf and Republican Senator Keith Perry, the bill that passed differs significantly. The original version of the bill aimed to ban the sale of any e-cigarette products that were not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This would have severely limited retailers to only selling 23 products from Reynolds Tobacco, Japan Tobacco International, and their parent company, Altria, all of which are tobacco flavored.

 

Irwin Redl and Perry expressed that their goal is to protect the youth in Florida, who prefer fruit flavors and well-designed products. They cited data from the FDA and the US Department of Health, which shows that flavored e-cigarette products, including mint, are more attractive to children. Attorney General Ashley Moody, who filed a lawsuit against e-cigarette company Juul in October, shares the same view. She asserts that Juul's products are "sophisticated in design, easily concealable, and ... flavors appeal to underage users."

 

However, during the committee process, lawmakers heard continuous complaints from e-cigarette shop owners, former tobacco users, and industry advocates: the upcoming flavor ban will have a detrimental impact on their businesses and could potentially lead to smokers relapsing. The revised HB 1007 bill appears to be a concession.

 

The bill does not use FDA standards, but instructs the legal department under Moody's leadership to develop and maintain a catalog regarding disposable nicotine e-cigarettes that may appeal to minors. The department must make this catalog publicly available by January 1, 2025, and update it regularly thereafter.

 

Once a product is added to the list, retailers and wholesalers will have 60 days to sell the product or remove it from inventory. After this period, these products may be seized or destroyed. Those who intentionally sell, transport, or receive prohibited products may face up to one year in prison and a $1000 fine. Starting from March 1, 2025, manufacturers selling banned products within the state will be subject to a $1000 per day penalty per device until the product is removed from the market.

 

These stringent regulations will have an impact on manufacturers, retailers, wholesalers, and distributors of products transported within the state of Florida. The HB 1007 bill received unanimous support in the Senate.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Legal Analysis: Why SKE Lost the “CRYSTAL BAR” Trademark Case and Key Takeaways
Legal Analysis: Why SKE Lost the “CRYSTAL BAR” Trademark Case and Key Takeaways
Attorney Liu Peiling analyzed SKE’s loss in the “CRYSTAL BAR” trademark case, highlighting the UK’s “first-to-file” principle and common pitfalls in Chinese firms’ overseas IP strategies, such as delayed registration and weak evidence. She urged Chinese brands to plan trademark filings early and improve evidence retention to avoid disputes and protect their rights.
Jul.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Research Review | Between Harm Reduction and Environmental Care: Innovation, Regulation, and New Environmental Challenges in Argentina and South America
Research Review | Between Harm Reduction and Environmental Care: Innovation, Regulation, and New Environmental Challenges in Argentina and South America
This article is based on research materials provided by an Argentine team and edited by 2Firsts. It reviews the latest developments in South America’s NGP market, covering regulatory differences, environmental challenges, and the balance between harm reduction and sustainability.
Aug.25
Australia's First Case: Man Arrested for Supplying Nicotine-based E-Liquid, 2.1kg of Illicit Substance Seized
Australia's First Case: Man Arrested for Supplying Nicotine-based E-Liquid, 2.1kg of Illicit Substance Seized
Police in New South Wales, Australia, have charged a Sydney man for allegedly adding the high-risk synthetic opioid "Nitazene" to e-liquid and illegally selling it. This marks Australia's first criminal case involving this substance in e-cigarettes.
Aug.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Ukrainian Customs Seizes Disposable E-cigarettes Worth Over USD 70,000
Ukrainian Customs Seizes Disposable E-cigarettes Worth Over USD 70,000
Ukrainian customs officials have seized 7,500 disposable e-cigarettes, with the case involving an estimated value of 2.8 million hryvnias (about USD 70,000). Legal action has been initiated.
Aug.19 by 2FIRSTS.ai
The Consumers Association of Penang of Malaysia: Should Follow Singapore's Lead in Treating E-Cigarettes as Drugs for Comprehensive Regulation
The Consumers Association of Penang of Malaysia: Should Follow Singapore's Lead in Treating E-Cigarettes as Drugs for Comprehensive Regulation
Consumer Association of Penang (CAP) urges Malaysian government to follow Singapore in treating e-cigarettes as a drug threat.
Aug.25 by 2FIRSTS.ai
U.S. Federal Judge Rejects Flavored Vape Maker’s Appeal, Upholds New York City Enforcement
U.S. Federal Judge Rejects Flavored Vape Maker’s Appeal, Upholds New York City Enforcement
On July 15, 2025, a Manhattan federal judge denied a motion to dismiss New York City’s lawsuit against eight e-cigarette wholesalers accused of illegally selling flavored vapes. The court affirmed the city’s right to sue and upheld its claims.
Jul.16 by 2FIRSTS.ai