Malaysian E-Cigarette Organization Opposes Ban, Claims Pharmaceutical Companies Are the Driving Force Behind It

Aug.06.2025
Malaysian E-Cigarette Organization Opposes Ban, Claims Pharmaceutical Companies Are the Driving Force Behind It
The Malaysian e-cigarette group Move opposes a nationwide ban, claiming large pharmaceutical companies, not tobacco firms, are behind it to protect their nicotine replacement products. They warn a ban could boost the black market and public health risks, urging the government to focus on regulation and enforcement instead of banning legal products.

Key points:

 

·The Malaysian e-cigarette advocacy organization, Move, has accused "big pharmaceutical companies" of behind-the-scenes efforts to push for a ban on e-cigarettes in order to protect their own products and suppress competition. 

 

·The organization opposes a blanket ban, arguing that existing regulations should be enforced more rigorously and sales channels should be regulated, rather than implementing a one-size-fits-all solution. 

 

·They have warned that a ban could potentially destroy the legal e-cigarette industry worth 30 billion ringgit (approximately $7 billion), leading to a proliferation of the black market and increasing health risks. 

 

·The government is currently assessing the feasibility of the ban, with some states already suspending license approvals. A final decision is expected to be announced within the next few months.

 


【2Firsts News Flash】According to a report by Scoop on August 6th, Samsul Kamal Ariffin, chairman of the Malaysian e-cigarette organization (Move), claimed that the driving force behind the proposed nationwide e-cigarette ban is pharmaceutical companies.

 

During his appearance on the "Scoop Insight" podcast, Sam Sur accuses "big pharmaceutical companies" of using their influence to undermine the e-cigarette industry in order to protect their nicotine replacement products - a category of products currently facing intense competition from alternatives such as e-cigarettes.

 

The real mastermind behind the proposal to implement an e-cigarette ban is not the big tobacco companies, but the big pharmaceutical companies," Sam Sull said. "They have been influencing policymakers behind the scenes because e-cigarettes threaten their market share.

 

He further alleges that pharmaceutical companies are leveraging growing concerns over the misuse of e-cigarettes and the increased sale of them to minors to push for a blanket ban instead of evidence-based regulation measures.

 

Samuel warned that such bans could backfire, leading consumers to turn to black market products that are often unregulated and have a higher risk of danger, ultimately resulting in public health risks.

 

By banning something, you cannot eliminate the demand. This will only prevent people from accessing legal and regulated products, creating space for illegal and unsafe products," he warned.

 

The Malaysian Ministry of Health is currently assessing the feasibility of a nationwide ban on e-cigarettes. Health Minister Datuk Seri Dzulkefly Ahmad confirmed that an expert committee is reviewing the proposal's impact on legal, economic, and public health aspects.

 

According to the Public Health Smoking Product Control Act of 2024 (Bill 852), e-cigarette liquids containing nicotine must be registered with the Drug Control Agency (DCA) and it is prohibited to sell them to individuals under the age of 18.

 

Sam Su believes that a blanket ban is not the solution. Instead, he calls for stronger enforcement of existing regulations and suggests that e-cigarette products should only be sold in licensed e-cigarette stores operated by trained staff, rather than convenience stores or street stalls. He also advocates for more robust measures to curb illegal online sales and strengthen public education initiatives.

 

The ban has never been effective. We have seen this in Singapore, India, and even Australia. When regulation fails, the black market thrives," he pointed out.

 

Move and other industry organizations repeatedly emphasize that e-cigarettes are a tool for adult smokers to reduce harm. Sam Suhar cited data from Public Health England and various international studies to reiterate that the harm of e-cigarettes is far less than traditional cigarettes, and they have already helped many Malaysians successfully quit smoking.

 

He also warned that the sudden implementation of a ban could potentially destroy Malaysia's legal e-cigarette industry, which is estimated to be worth over 3 billion ringgit (approximately $700 million) and supports thousands of small businesses and jobs nationwide.

 

If e-cigarettes are prohibited overnight, it will not only strangle people's livelihoods but also enable illegal trading to flourish," he said. "This will not only fail to protect public health but will also expose more people to greater risks.

 

The government is expected to announce a decision on the proposed ban in the coming months. However, concerns are growing that a nationwide ban may soon be implemented as states like Johor, Kelantan, Selangor, and Pahang have already suspended the approval of e-cigarette licenses.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

New York’s 75% Wholesale Tax on Nicotine Pouches Takes Effect Sept. 1, With Aug. 31 Inventory Subject to Floor Tax
New York’s 75% Wholesale Tax on Nicotine Pouches Takes Effect Sept. 1, With Aug. 31 Inventory Subject to Floor Tax
New York State will extend its tobacco products tax to “alternative nicotine products,” including tobacco-free nicotine pouches, from September 1, 2026, at a rate of 75% of the wholesale price. Distributors, wholesalers and retailers must also inventory products held as of 11:59 p.m. on August 31 and pay a floor tax. Vapor products are excluded from the new category and remain subject to New York's separate 20% supplemental sales tax on the retail price.
Aug.26
Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore and four authorized U.S. CCELL distributors are asking a California federal court to permanently dismiss a core antitrust claim brought by direct purchasers. Plaintiffs allege that Smoore coordinated minimum wholesale prices, customer allocation and limits on price competition among distributors, amounting to a per se unlawful horizontal conspiracy. The defendants say the alleged conduct reflects ordinary vertical relationships between a manufacturer and its distributors. The court previously dismissed a similar claim, and the latest dispute centers on whether the second amended complaint adds sufficient facts to establish a horizontal agreement.
Sep.14
How Many Nicotine Pouch Factories Does Europe Need? 2Firsts Interviews AIRSCREAM on the OEM Market
How Many Nicotine Pouch Factories Does Europe Need? 2Firsts Interviews AIRSCREAM on the OEM Market
At InterTabac 2026, nicotine pouch growth was visible not only in brands but across equipment, raw materials and OEM manufacturing. 2Firsts interviewed AIRSCREAM commercial head Steve Moore on how many pouch factories Europe may ultimately need and where manufacturers can differentiate, from formulation and flavour to pouch materials, production consistency and customer service. The category continues to expand, but questions remain over future capacity, consolidation and the long-term structure of the supply chain.
Sep.18
Indiana Halts Sales of Elf Bar, Lost Mary, MR FOG and iJOY Vapes Under Foreign-Adversary Rules; Some Products Return After Compliance Filings
Indiana Halts Sales of Elf Bar, Lost Mary, MR FOG and iJOY Vapes Under Foreign-Adversary Rules; Some Products Return After Compliance Filings
Indiana's Alcohol and Tobacco Commission (ATC) ordered tobacco certificate holders in September to remove certain vaping products marketed under Elf Bar, Lost Mary, MR FOG, iJOY and other brands from inventory under the state's foreign-adversary product law. The agency later listed 257 MR FOG products and 77 Lost Mary product entries as lawful for sale. The Lost Mary revision expressly stated that compliance evidence had been received for 20 additional products. 2Firsts compliance expert Kurt said potential filings could include e-liquid and ingredient-origin records, U.S. nicotine-analog supply-chain documentation and FDA premarket application status.
Regulations
Oct.08
Australia Adds 6-Methylnicotine to Schedule 9 Prohibited Substances, Effective October 1
Australia Adds 6-Methylnicotine to Schedule 9 Prohibited Substances, Effective October 1
Australia's Therapeutic Goods Administration published a final decision on September 25 to classify 6-methylnicotine as a Schedule 9 prohibited substance under the Poisons Standard, effective October 1, 2026. TGA said the chemical has been reported in e-cigarette liquids sold in Australia and marketed as nicotine-free or nicotine alternatives, while evidence also indicates its use in preparations such as oral pouches. The government originally proposed a Schedule 7 classification but ultimately adopted the stricter Schedule 9 designation, citing acute toxicity, dependence risk, use in unapproved consumer products and misleading marketing.
News
Sep.29 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Product | DOJO Launches BLAST10K Fresh in UK With 0+10ml E-Liquid Structure, Retaining 2+8ml Pod Compatibility
Product | DOJO Launches BLAST10K Fresh in UK With 0+10ml E-Liquid Structure, Retaining 2+8ml Pod Compatibility
DOJO launched the BLAST10K Fresh in the UK on September 4, 2026, introducing its INSTA-JUICED™ technology and a new 0+10ml structure that keeps e-liquid separated from the coil before activation. The device features a 1000mAh rechargeable battery, COREX BLAST dual-mesh technology and SSS leak-resistant technology, with a manufacturer-rated capacity of up to 10,000 puffs. It also retains compatibility with existing 2+8ml pods across the BLAST ecosystem. The launch introduces eight new flavors, including Matcha Strawberry, which DOJO describes as an industry first.
Market
Sep.04