Malaysian E-Cigarette Organization Opposes Ban, Claims Pharmaceutical Companies Are the Driving Force Behind It

Aug.06
Malaysian E-Cigarette Organization Opposes Ban, Claims Pharmaceutical Companies Are the Driving Force Behind It
The Malaysian e-cigarette group Move opposes a nationwide ban, claiming large pharmaceutical companies, not tobacco firms, are behind it to protect their nicotine replacement products. They warn a ban could boost the black market and public health risks, urging the government to focus on regulation and enforcement instead of banning legal products.

Key points:

 

·The Malaysian e-cigarette advocacy organization, Move, has accused "big pharmaceutical companies" of behind-the-scenes efforts to push for a ban on e-cigarettes in order to protect their own products and suppress competition. 

 

·The organization opposes a blanket ban, arguing that existing regulations should be enforced more rigorously and sales channels should be regulated, rather than implementing a one-size-fits-all solution. 

 

·They have warned that a ban could potentially destroy the legal e-cigarette industry worth 30 billion ringgit (approximately $7 billion), leading to a proliferation of the black market and increasing health risks. 

 

·The government is currently assessing the feasibility of the ban, with some states already suspending license approvals. A final decision is expected to be announced within the next few months.

 


【2Firsts News Flash】According to a report by Scoop on August 6th, Samsul Kamal Ariffin, chairman of the Malaysian e-cigarette organization (Move), claimed that the driving force behind the proposed nationwide e-cigarette ban is pharmaceutical companies.

 

During his appearance on the "Scoop Insight" podcast, Sam Sur accuses "big pharmaceutical companies" of using their influence to undermine the e-cigarette industry in order to protect their nicotine replacement products - a category of products currently facing intense competition from alternatives such as e-cigarettes.

 

The real mastermind behind the proposal to implement an e-cigarette ban is not the big tobacco companies, but the big pharmaceutical companies," Sam Sull said. "They have been influencing policymakers behind the scenes because e-cigarettes threaten their market share.

 

He further alleges that pharmaceutical companies are leveraging growing concerns over the misuse of e-cigarettes and the increased sale of them to minors to push for a blanket ban instead of evidence-based regulation measures.

 

Samuel warned that such bans could backfire, leading consumers to turn to black market products that are often unregulated and have a higher risk of danger, ultimately resulting in public health risks.

 

By banning something, you cannot eliminate the demand. This will only prevent people from accessing legal and regulated products, creating space for illegal and unsafe products," he warned.

 

The Malaysian Ministry of Health is currently assessing the feasibility of a nationwide ban on e-cigarettes. Health Minister Datuk Seri Dzulkefly Ahmad confirmed that an expert committee is reviewing the proposal's impact on legal, economic, and public health aspects.

 

According to the Public Health Smoking Product Control Act of 2024 (Bill 852), e-cigarette liquids containing nicotine must be registered with the Drug Control Agency (DCA) and it is prohibited to sell them to individuals under the age of 18.

 

Sam Su believes that a blanket ban is not the solution. Instead, he calls for stronger enforcement of existing regulations and suggests that e-cigarette products should only be sold in licensed e-cigarette stores operated by trained staff, rather than convenience stores or street stalls. He also advocates for more robust measures to curb illegal online sales and strengthen public education initiatives.

 

The ban has never been effective. We have seen this in Singapore, India, and even Australia. When regulation fails, the black market thrives," he pointed out.

 

Move and other industry organizations repeatedly emphasize that e-cigarettes are a tool for adult smokers to reduce harm. Sam Suhar cited data from Public Health England and various international studies to reiterate that the harm of e-cigarettes is far less than traditional cigarettes, and they have already helped many Malaysians successfully quit smoking.

 

He also warned that the sudden implementation of a ban could potentially destroy Malaysia's legal e-cigarette industry, which is estimated to be worth over 3 billion ringgit (approximately $700 million) and supports thousands of small businesses and jobs nationwide.

 

If e-cigarettes are prohibited overnight, it will not only strangle people's livelihoods but also enable illegal trading to flourish," he said. "This will not only fail to protect public health but will also expose more people to greater risks.

 

The government is expected to announce a decision on the proposed ban in the coming months. However, concerns are growing that a nationwide ban may soon be implemented as states like Johor, Kelantan, Selangor, and Pahang have already suspended the approval of e-cigarette licenses.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Legal Analysis: Why SKE Lost the “CRYSTAL BAR” Trademark Case and Key Takeaways
Legal Analysis: Why SKE Lost the “CRYSTAL BAR” Trademark Case and Key Takeaways
Attorney Liu Peiling analyzed SKE’s loss in the “CRYSTAL BAR” trademark case, highlighting the UK’s “first-to-file” principle and common pitfalls in Chinese firms’ overseas IP strategies, such as delayed registration and weak evidence. She urged Chinese brands to plan trademark filings early and improve evidence retention to avoid disputes and protect their rights.
Jul.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Product | UK MHRA Lists Multiple Low-Nicotine Sweet-Flavored SKUs from AL FAKHER; VOZOL and VOOPOO Roll Out New Open-System Devices
Product | UK MHRA Lists Multiple Low-Nicotine Sweet-Flavored SKUs from AL FAKHER; VOZOL and VOOPOO Roll Out New Open-System Devices
The UK MHRA database shows a surge of new SKU listings from brands like ELFBAR and SKE in early July, featuring high-capacity devices and low-nicotine sweet-flavored products. Amid the looming disposable vape ban, compliant products such as open-system devices have become the focus of these filings.
Jul.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Malaysia’s Sarawak State Weighs Ban on E-Cigarette Sales
Malaysia’s Sarawak State Weighs Ban on E-Cigarette Sales
Sarawak is considering a ban on e-cigarette sales amid concerns over drug use in vape products. Minister Abdul Karim Rahman Hamzah called it a national issue, with the proposal gaining support at a July 16 anti-drug council meeting. Federal law is needed to enforce a ban.
Jul.17 by 2FIRSTS.ai
2Firsts Insight | Are “Vape + Cigarette” Hybrid Products Becoming a Trend? Multiple Companies Launch Combined Solutions
2Firsts Insight | Are “Vape + Cigarette” Hybrid Products Becoming a Trend? Multiple Companies Launch Combined Solutions
South Korean brand ETo recently launched ETo HYBRID, a new product combining heated tobacco and e-cigarette functions, further blending traditional tobacco with vaping technology. In May, CFU Vaping Experience, part of Heyuan Group, introduced a similar “hybrid” device called MixIn. This trend indicates that more manufacturers are exploring the potential of “vape + cigarette” combined products.
Jul.15 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Sweden Promotes Nicotine Alternatives, Smoking Rate Set to Drop to Lowest in the EU
Sweden Promotes Nicotine Alternatives, Smoking Rate Set to Drop to Lowest in the EU
Sweden, with the lowest smoking rate in Europe and declining lung cancer deaths, credits its success to promoting lower-risk nicotine products, which are affordable, reduce secondhand smoke, and are government-supported as cigarette alternatives. With an adult smoking rate of around 5%, Sweden is on track to become the first smoke-free nation, though concerns about nicotine dependence and alternative products remain.
Aug.05 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Controversy Over “Smoking Lu Xun” Mural Propels Nicotine Pouches into China’s Public Discourse
Controversy Over “Smoking Lu Xun” Mural Propels Nicotine Pouches into China’s Public Discourse
A complaint targeting a cultural icon unexpectedly thrust a little-known nicotine product into the national spotlight—triggering widespread confusion and backlash.
Aug.27