Philip Morris Ukraine Says Ukraine’s Flavored Vape Ban Still Lacks Effective Enforcement

Mar.17
Philip Morris Ukraine Says Ukraine’s Flavored Vape Ban Still Lacks Effective Enforcement
Mikhail Polyakov, deputy general director for corporate affairs at Philip Morris Ukraine, said Ukraine’s ban on flavored and aromatic additives for e-cigarettes, in force since July 11, 2024, has not worked in practice because compliance is not being enforced.

Key Takeaways

 

  • Ukraine banned the sale of flavored and aromatic additives for e-cigarettes from July 11, 2024.
  • A Philip Morris Ukraine executive said the ban has not worked in practice because enforcement is lacking.
  • He said nine out of ten shopping centers in Kyiv contain illegal vape shops.
  • He said the parliament has adopted the necessary laws to combat the illegal tobacco market, but some rules are poorly enforced or not enforced at all.
  • He also said he hopes international partners’ demands will shift more attention toward entities that do not pay taxes.

 


 

2Firsts, March 17, 2026

 

According to Interfax-Ukraine, Mikhail Polyakov, deputy general director for corporate affairs at Philip Morris Ukraine, said that Ukraine’s ban on the sale of flavored and aromatic additives for e-cigarettes, introduced by the Verkhovna Rada from July 11, 2024, has not worked in practice, as experts had warned, because no one is controlling compliance with the ban.

 

Speaking at the European integration-focused “Dialogues with NV” event held last week, Mikhail Polyakov said that nine out of ten shopping centers in Kyiv contain illegal vape shops. He said the question is whether law-enforcement bodies and supervisory authorities do not know about this situation or whether they do know about it.

 

In his view, by adopting such a law, parliament effectively assumed the obligation to ban flavored and aromatic additives in e-cigarettes, but that obligation failed because there is no enforcement at the local level to ensure compliance with the rules.

 

He said there is no point in making decisions about bans if no one can control them. He also said they found only one shopping center in the city center that did not have an illegal vape kiosk.

 

Mikhail Polyakov stressed that in the tobacco industry, parliament has adopted all the necessary legislative acts that should have combated the illegal market, but in practice these rules either work poorly or do not work at all because there is no force to apply them.

 

He gave examples of how legislative norms are being bypassed. He said there are tax posts and video surveillance at tobacco factories, but the system was circumvented by opening workshops three kilometers away where there are no such posts and no surveillance. He also said that after a minimum cigarette price was introduced because taxes account for more than 70% of the price, some market participants began printing prices from an earlier year on packs, when the minimum price did not yet apply, and presenting the products as if they had been manufactured several years ago.

 

He said he hopes that, with the help of requirements from international partners such as the International Monetary Fund, the issue of increasing budget revenue mobilisation will ultimately focus on those who do not pay taxes, while those who do pay taxes will not be prevented from continuing to do so.

 

Image source: Interfax-Ukraine

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

DTI drafts administrative order proposing an open-pod and e-liquid ban and opens it for public consultation
DTI drafts administrative order proposing an open-pod and e-liquid ban and opens it for public consultation
Department of Trade and Industry’s (DTI) proposed move to restrict harmful vape products to protect young people, but said only a total ban on all vaping and novel tobacco products would effectively safeguard public health. The group warned that limiting rules to certain products such as open pods and e-liquids could create a “dangerous behavioral loophole,” leading users—especially youth—to switch to disposable or closed-system alternatives instead of quitting.
Feb.10 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Alabama Senate Passes SB9 to Ban Vaping in Indoor Public Places
Alabama Senate Passes SB9 to Ban Vaping in Indoor Public Places
Alabama’s Senate approved SB9 by a 31–1 vote, expanding existing indoor smoking restrictions to include vaping in a wide range of public places. The bill keeps the current $25 fine, renames the state’s Clean Indoor Air Act, and now heads to the House. If enacted, it would take effect on Oct. 1, 2026.
Feb.02 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Brazil’s Teen E-Cigarette Experimentation Rate Rises to 29.6% Over Five Years
Brazil’s Teen E-Cigarette Experimentation Rate Rises to 29.6% Over Five Years
Brazil’s National School Health Survey (PeNSE) 2024 found that e-cigarette experimentation among students aged 13 to 17 rose from 16.8% in 2019 to 29.6% in 2024, while use in the previous 30 days increased from 8.6% to 26.3%. Over the same period, conventional cigarette experimentation fell from 22.6% to 18.5%, and hookah use declined from 26.9% to 16.4%.
Mar.26 by 2FIRSTS.ai
JT Delivers Record FY2025 Results as RRP Accelerates and Ploom Expands Globally
JT Delivers Record FY2025 Results as RRP Accelerates and Ploom Expands Globally
JT reported record FY2025 revenue and adjusted operating profit, supported by combustible resilience and accelerating reduced-risk product growth. Heated tobacco volumes surged, led by Ploom. The group confirmed a major three-year RRP investment plan and projected further growth in 2026.
Feb.12
Russia Moves Toward Full Ban on E-Cigarettes and Vapes, With Scope Still Under Discussion
Russia Moves Toward Full Ban on E-Cigarettes and Vapes, With Scope Still Under Discussion
Russia’s State Commission for Countering Illegal Trafficking in Industrial Products on March 25 supported an initiative to fully ban the production, import and circulation of electronic cigarettes, vapes and refill liquids in Russia.
Mar.26 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Nebraska weighs child-safety lock requirement for vapes sold in the state
Nebraska weighs child-safety lock requirement for vapes sold in the state
Nebraska lawmakers heard testimony on LB1254, which would require electronic smoking devices sold in the state to include built-in child safety features. Violations would be a Class IV misdemeanor carrying a fine of up to $500. Supporters argued young children can easily activate unprotected devices by inhaling, risking exposure to nicotine and other toxic chemicals, and said safeguards should mirror child-resistant measures used for medications and other household products.
Feb.28 by 2FIRSTS.ai