Taiwan Urged to Implement Flavor Ban Without Delay

Aug.21.2024
Taiwan Urged to Implement Flavor Ban Without Delay
Taipei Times reports on August 21 that Tobacco Control Alliance urges Taiwan's Health Ministry not to hinder flavor ban proposal.

According to Taipei Times reported on August 21, the Tobacco Control Alliance is urging Taiwan's Ministry of Health and Welfare not to hinder the proposed flavor ban and not to delay the implementation of the policy.


The alliance is asking the Department of Health and Welfare whether they oppose the resolution by lawmakers to completely ban the sale of flavored tobacco products.


On August 9th, the department released a recommendation to prohibit the use of 27 chemicals in cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and HNB tobacco products.


Wang Han-yang, Chairman of the National Alliance for Basic Education Action, stated that additives in flavored cigarettes reduce the harsh smell of smoke, which attracts young people and women to smoke.


He stated that according to Article 10 of the Tobacco Hazard Prevention Act, prohibited additives cannot be used in tobacco products, and lawmakers have agreed to completely ban the sale of all flavored tobacco products.


The Ministry of Health and Welfare recommended in March of last year to only ban four flavors: flower, fruit, chocolate, and mint. However, this suggestion was questioned because it did not cover the ten most common flavors.


However, after 16 months of delay, the department only proposed banning 27 additives, instead of all flavor additives, citing that this aligns with practices in the United States and the European Union.


Last Friday, the alliance submitted a petition signed by 173 civil society groups to representatives of the ruling party and opposition parties in Taiwan.


In the letter, it was asked:


Is the Department of Health and Welfare trying to veto the legislative proposal to ban the sale of flavored tobacco by only prohibiting 27 additives?


The letter also raised doubts about...


When most similar regulations in the United States and 27 countries of the European Union are aimed at tobacco flavors, does the statement of the Ministry of Health and Welfare hold up? Especially when the EU has already completely banned all flavored tobaccos that mask the taste of tobacco.


The group stated that the ban on flavored tobacco products should align with President William Lai's "Healthy China Taiwan" plan.


They asked,


Why is the Ministry of Health and Welfare only banning 27 additives, despite industry reports showing over 1200 different flavor additives? Will the Ministry of Health and Welfare also be able to ban concept flavors invented by tobacco companies by simply banning additives – such as "Arctic Chill" and "Tropical Breeze"?


The alliance points out that the FDA has staff responsible for inspecting and fining for "abnormal odors or flavors" in food, but the Health Promotion Bureau states that it cannot regulate the taste of tobacco products solely based on odor.


Why is the Ministry of Health's attitude towards tobacco companies so divergent?


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

ZYN’s Trademark Dilemma in China | Legal Opinion Submitted to 2Firsts
ZYN’s Trademark Dilemma in China | Legal Opinion Submitted to 2Firsts
ZYN faces trademark revocation and enforcement challenges in China. In this legal commentary submitted to 2Firsts, the author examines regulatory gaps, enforcement hurdles, and the high legal risks surrounding nicotine pouch trademarks.
Oct.14
Research Abstract|Months After Flavored Tobacco Ban, More Than Half of Vape Shops in California Remain Noncompliant
Research Abstract|Months After Flavored Tobacco Ban, More Than Half of Vape Shops in California Remain Noncompliant
The study evaluated early compliance with California’s flavored tobacco sales ban (SB 793). Between April and July 2023, the research team conducted field observations at 400 vape retailers, focusing on the availability of flavored disposable e-cigarettes and JUUL pods. Results showed that about 50.3% of stores were still selling flavored products in violation of the ban, including 53.2% of disposable vape retailers and 30.9% of JUUL pod retailers.
Sep.01 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Malaysia Parliament: Health Committee Chair Displays Multiple Vape Products, Urges Stronger Warnings on Youth Risks
Malaysia Parliament: Health Committee Chair Displays Multiple Vape Products, Urges Stronger Warnings on Youth Risks
During a Dewan Rakyat session on August 27, Malaysia’s Parliamentary Special Select Committee on Health showcased various vape products of different sizes, shapes, and colors. Committee chairman Suhaizan Kaiat warned that such products are deliberately designed to resemble USB pens, toys, and color pencils to attract minors and evade enforcement checks.
Aug.27 by 2FIRSTS.ai
First week of the ban: Wisconsin retail sales plunge 90%, inventories sealed, shelves left bare
First week of the ban: Wisconsin retail sales plunge 90%, inventories sealed, shelves left bare
After Wisconsin’s new vape ban took effect, many vape shops across the state reported emptied displays and sharp sales declines. The law requires the state Department of Revenue to fine retailers that sell vaping devices without U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorization. The industry group WiscoFAST has sued the Wisconsin Department of Revenue, arguing the law improperly encroaches on federal oversight. Some business owners say sales have dropped by as much as 90% since the ban took
Sep.04 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Australia cracks down on major tobacco smuggling case, involving tax evasion exceeding US$24.21 million
Australia cracks down on major tobacco smuggling case, involving tax evasion exceeding US$24.21 million
Australian police seize tons of illicit tobacco and millions of cigarettes in Victoria's largest illegal tobacco case.
Sep.11 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Singapore's four-day joint operation to investigate e-cigarettes resulted in the arrest of four e-cigarette users
Singapore's four-day joint operation to investigate e-cigarettes resulted in the arrest of four e-cigarette users
Singapore's HSA & NEA held a 4-day joint op against e-cig use in Tampines, CBD & other areas: 4 offenders (24-43) caught, fined on-site; 27 e-cigs/accessories seized. Singapore also tightened e-cig enforcement, authorizing over 5k frontline officers on Sept 9; stricter penalties took effect Sept 1—1st under-18s: S$500 (≈US$389), 18+: S$700 (≈US$545); 2nd offenders: 3-mth rehab; 3rd+: prosecution, up to S$2k (≈US$1,557). Etomidate e-cig users face harsher penalties (higher fines, rehab) & prosecu
Sep.22 by 2FIRSTS.ai