USITC Issues Final Ruling in 337-TA-1392 Investigation, Imposes Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Orders

Jan.21
USITC Issues Final Ruling in 337-TA-1392 Investigation, Imposes Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Orders
USITC issues final ruling on oil vaporizing devices, components violating tariff law, with limited exclusion order and cease-and-desist orders.

Summary Overview

 

  • The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has made a final ruling in the investigation of 337-TA-1392, finding a violation of Section 337 of the 1930 Tariff Act.
  • The products involved are oil vaporizing devices, their components, and products containing them.
  • The US International Trade Commission has decided to issue a Limited Exclusion Order (LEO), which prohibits the importation of infringing products involved in the case into the United States.
  • The USITC has issued cease-and-desist orders (CDOs) against two defendants and announced the termination of the investigation.

 


 

 

2Firsts, January 21, 2026

 

According to an announcement from the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC), the ITC has found a violation of Section 337 of the 1930 Tariff Act in the case of "Certain Oil Vaporizing Devices, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same" (Investigation No. 337-TA-1392) and has decided to take remedial measures.

 

The announcement reveals that ITC will issue a Limited Exclusion Order (LEO), prohibiting unauthorized infringing oil atomization devices, their components, and products containing them from entering the US market. Additionally, cease and desist orders (CDO) have been issued against two defendants. The investigation in this case has concluded with the ruling.

 

According to the announcement, this case was originally filed on March 6, 2024, involving US patent numbers 11,369,756, 11,766,527, 11,369,757, and 11,759,580. The defendants include STIIIZY (STIIIZY IP LLC, STIIIZY, Inc., etc.) and ALD (ALD Group Limited, ALD Hong Kong Holdings).

 

In terms of program progress, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) issued a final initial determination (FID) on March 6, 2025, at which time it concluded that the complainant did not meet the domestic industry economic requirements for violating 337 for reasons such as "not meeting domestic industry economic requirements". Subsequently, the ITC conducted a review of the relevant findings, and after remand for reconsideration, the ALJ determined on July 18, 2025 that the complainant did meet the domestic industry economic requirements. Finally, the ITC reached a final determination that the violation constituted a violation of 337, and decided to issue remedies such as LEO and CDO.

 

The announcement also stated that during the period of presidential review, the import bond for the products involved in the infringement case has been set at 100%.

 

Image source: United States International Trade Commission (USITC)

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

One Year After UK Disposable Vape Ban: Youth Use Falls to 13%, Adult Use to 8%
One Year After UK Disposable Vape Ban: Youth Use Falls to 13%, Adult Use to 8%
among both youth and adults. However, industry groups and regulators warn that the illicit vape market remains a growing concern.
Jun.09
Special Report | Russian Vape Compromise Faces First Hurdles
Special Report | Russian Vape Compromise Faces First Hurdles
Russia’s regional vape-ban model is facing early legal and political tests, as Perm Krai moves ahead before federal legislation is fully adopted. The case highlights uncertainty over regional authority, concerns from business groups about market fragmentation, and the risk that pressure against regional bans could revive calls for a stricter nationwide prohibition.
Industry Insight
May.28
 Former DHS Spokesperson Analyzes CBP’s $175 Million Illegal Vape Seizure
Former DHS Spokesperson Analyzes CBP’s $175 Million Illegal Vape Seizure
The Washington Examiner published an opinion article by Tricia McLaughlin, former Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs and spokesperson at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, arguing that the Trump administration is strengthening enforcement against illegal vape supply chains through the FDA, CBP, and DHS.
Regulations
May.25
UK Parliament Briefing Puts Vape Hardware Design and Materials in Regulatory Focus
UK Parliament Briefing Puts Vape Hardware Design and Materials in Regulatory Focus
The UK Parliament’s Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology (POST) has published a scientific briefing reviewing current evidence on the health effects of vape device components, including heating elements, power settings, metals, plastics, batteries and e-liquid ingredients, signalling growing regulatory attention to device design and whole-product systems beyond e-liquids, flavours and packaging.
Special Report
Jun.29
RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
The Texas Supreme Court issued a case summary on May 8, 2026, describing its decision in Hancock v. RJR Vapor Co. LLC. The dispute centered on whether RJR Vapor’s VELO oral nicotine pouches are taxable as “tobacco products” under the Texas Tax Code. Lower courts had held that the pouches were not taxable tobacco products, but the Texas Supreme Court reversed, concluding that VELO pouches are taxable because they are made of “a tobacco substitute.”
May.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
FDA Commissioner Marty Makary Resigns After Opposing Trump Administration’s Flavored Vape Push
FDA Commissioner Marty Makary Resigns After Opposing Trump Administration’s Flavored Vape Push
FDA Commissioner Marty Makary resigned on May 12 after opposing the Trump administration’s push to authorize fruit-flavored vaping products, according to reporting by The New York Times. Makary reportedly objected over concerns that flavored vapes could attract young people and refused to support broader approvals.
News
May.13