BAT and PMI Collaborate to Produce Cigarettes in Switzerland

BATPMI by 2FIRSTS.ai
Dec.04.2023
BAT and PMI Collaborate to Produce Cigarettes in Switzerland
Swiss media Le Temps reports that British American Tobacco's Swiss subsidiary has reached a production agreement with Philip Morris International.

Swiss media outlet Le Temps reported on December 1st that the Swiss subsidiary of British American Tobacco (BAT) has revealed a collaboration agreement with Philip Morris International (PMI). According to the agreement, PMI will produce cigarettes for BAT at their factory located in the western Swiss city of Neuchâtel.

 

In its statement, BAT pointed out that this agreement is specifically targeted towards the domestic market in Switzerland. Reports suggest that due to insufficient production capacity at BAT's factories in Switzerland to meet market demands, the company has opted to collaborate with a rival factory. This is a common practice in the world of multinational corporations.

 

British American Tobacco (BAT) has announced that only a portion of its production in Neuchâtel will be dedicated to the Swiss market, while the remaining output, as well as previously exported goods, will be handled by other factories within the BAT Group. As part of the agreement between the two tobacco giants, six new positions will be added to the Boncourt factory (BAT's Switzerland-based facility).

 

This summer, British American Tobacco Switzerland announced that they would not completely exit Boncourt's operations, but would continue to retain warehouses and a shipping department there, providing approximately 15 jobs. The company's headquarters will also remain in Jura canton. As of December 14th, 2022, when the closure of the factory was announced, it employed a total of 220 staff members.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Michigan Senate Bill 786 Seeks to Ban Sale of Vapes With Metal Heating Elements
Michigan Senate Bill 786 Seeks to Ban Sale of Vapes With Metal Heating Elements
Michigan lawmakers introduced Senate Bill 786 on February 18, 2026, proposing to prohibit the sale or transfer of vapor products that contain heating elements unless those elements are made of or encased in glass or ceramic materials
Regulations
Feb.21
Texas college data show rapid shifts in top vaping brands, with Geek Bar/Vape surging by 2025
Texas college data show rapid shifts in top vaping brands, with Geek Bar/Vape surging by 2025
A short communication in Drug and Alcohol Dependence examined changes in the most commonly used nicotine vaping brands among Texas college students from 2023 to 2025. The study analyzed 6,049 students aged 18–25 who reported past-30-day nicotine vaping across three repeated cross-sectional spring surveys. The report found that use of Esco Bar, Elf Bar, JUUL, and Puff Bar declined from 2023 to 2025, while Geek Bar/Vape increased.
Feb.27 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Oklahoma prisons to sell vapes and nicotine pouches to inmates in bid to curb contraband and violence
Oklahoma prisons to sell vapes and nicotine pouches to inmates in bid to curb contraband and violence
Oklahoma Department of Corrections (DOC) will launch a program allowing inmates to buy sealed disposable nicotine vapes and packs of nicotine pouches through prison commissaries. Tobacco has been banned in Oklahoma prisons for 10 years, and cigarettes and cigars will remain prohibited.
Feb.28
Malaysia maritime officers seize nearly 16,500 vapes in suspected cross-border smuggling bid
Malaysia maritime officers seize nearly 16,500 vapes in suspected cross-border smuggling bid
According to Malay Mail and Bernama, Malaysia’s maritime enforcement agency intercepted a suspicious lorry at a jetty in Kedah’s Kuala Sanglang and seized nearly 16,500 vape devices worth more than RM500,000 (about US$125,000). Three men were detained for investigation, and the case is being probed under Malaysia’s Customs Act 1967.
Mar.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
DTI drafts administrative order proposing an open-pod and e-liquid ban and opens it for public consultation
DTI drafts administrative order proposing an open-pod and e-liquid ban and opens it for public consultation
Department of Trade and Industry’s (DTI) proposed move to restrict harmful vape products to protect young people, but said only a total ban on all vaping and novel tobacco products would effectively safeguard public health. The group warned that limiting rules to certain products such as open pods and e-liquids could create a “dangerous behavioral loophole,” leading users—especially youth—to switch to disposable or closed-system alternatives instead of quitting.
Feb.10 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Fiscal benefit, not health, strongest indicator for vape bans – Contributed by Samrat Chowdhery
Fiscal benefit, not health, strongest indicator for vape bans – Contributed by Samrat Chowdhery
Data shows 75% of nations with state stakes in tobacco trade ban modern substitutes compared to 10% in the free-market group. What is driving these divergent regulations?
Feb.04