Juul to Pay $462 Million Settlement for Underage Marketing

Apr.13.2023
Juul to Pay $462 Million Settlement for Underage Marketing
US e-cigarette giant Juul pays $462m to six states and Washington DC to settle charges of selling to minors.

On April 12th, American vaping behemoth Juul Labs Inc agreed to pay $462 million to six US states and the District of Columbia to settle allegations of marketing to minors. This marks the largest settlement amount to date against the company. Juul did not admit to any wrongdoing in the settlement.


In this agreement, Juul and each state received the following settlement amounts:


California has reached a record-breaking settlement agreement of $175.8 million with Juul, the largest such agreement between the electronic cigarette company and any U.S. state. New York has also settled for $112.7 million, followed by Illinois with $67.6 million, Massachusetts with $41 million, Colorado with $31.7 million, New Mexico with $17.1 million, and Washington D.C. with $15.2 million. This latest agreement marks the most recent in a string of settlements between Juul and cities and states across the country, all of which include various restrictions on the company's marketing, sales, and distribution of its products, including a ban on any marketing targeted at young people and limits on customer purchases in both retail stores and online.


On December 6, 2022, Juul announced that it has secured investment to cover settlement costs. The company has been in talks with two early investors regarding a financial assistance plan to cover their legal liabilities.


Juul accused of false marketing.


About five years ago, Juul became the champion of the US electronic cigarette market with the popularity of flavors such as mango and mint. Parents, school administrators, and politicians largely blamed the company for the sharp increase in underage vaping.


According to Reuters, these states are accusing Juul of falsely marketing its e-cigarettes as less addictive than traditional cigarettes and using glamorous advertising targeting minors.


Juul has stated that since autumn 2019, when they changed their marketing strategy, there has been a 95% decrease in the use of their products by individuals under the age of 18.


In September 2022, Juul Labs agreed to pay nearly $440 million to settle investigations into its marketing of electronic cigarettes by 33 US states.


In late June 2022, Juul's e-cigarettes were temporarily banned in the United States. The FDA believed that the company had not proven that the sale of its products was suitable for public health. However, after an appeal, the health regulatory agency lifted the ban and agreed to conduct additional review of Juul's marketing application.


In October 2022, Juul released details of its MDO appeal. In late September of last year, Juul shareholder Altria Group exercised its option to terminate the non-compete agreement with the e-cigarette manufacturer.


For further reading:


Juul has reached a settlement with West Virginia for a price of $7.9 million. The company will pay hundreds of millions of dollars in total settlement fees.


US brand Juul will pay $440 million to reach a settlement with various states.


JUUL, in an effort to reach settlements, has spent $18.2 billion. Here is a list of each state's settlement amount and conditions.


Special Report: Juul Settlement Overview - Two Firsts


Reference:


The company Juul Labs has agreed to pay $462 million to six states in the United States.


Juul has reached a significant settlement with six states, including California, agreeing to pay $175.8 million to the state.


Colorado is set to receive $31 million as a result of a national settlement with e-cigarette company Juul.


E-cigarette company Juul has been ordered to pay $67.6 million in a settlement with the state of Illinois, related to its marketing practices that allegedly targeted youth. The settlement comes after a two-year investigation by the state attorney general's office into Juul's marketing tactics to attract young people, which included social media campaigns, flavored products, and online advertising. This is the first state settlement of its kind with Juul, which has faced widespread criticism over its role in the rise of youth vaping.


The Attorney General's Office has reached a multistate settlement with JUUL totaling $462 million. Massachusetts has also secured $41 million as part of this settlement.


The state of New Mexico is set to receive more than $17 million from Juul as part of a settlement to resolve a lawsuit pertaining to the use of vaping products by minors.


E-cigarette company Juul has agreed to pay $15.2 million to Washington DC for advertising and promoting vaping products to minors.


The JUUL vape company is set to provide $112 million to the state of New York.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
According to VitalLaw on August 27, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated an FDA marketing denial order (MDO) against NicQuid LLC, ruling that the agency’s comparative-efficacy standard for electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) applications had become a substantive rule requiring notice-and-comment rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The court did not reject FDA’s authority to compare the public health benefits and risks of flavored vapes, but held that the agency could not establish a broadly binding standard through informal adjudications. The case was remanded to FDA for further proceedings.
Aug.28
Australia’s Victoria Steps Up Illegal Tobacco Enforcement With Store Closures and Penalties of Up to A$2.5 Million
Australia’s Victoria Steps Up Illegal Tobacco Enforcement With Store Closures and Penalties of Up to A$2.5 Million
Australia’s state of Victoria has activated new powers allowing Tobacco Licensing Victoria and police to shut premises suspected of selling, supplying or possessing illicit tobacco for up to 90 days. Longer closures can be ordered by a magistrates’ court. Businesses subject to closure orders must generally cease all trading and will be placed on a public list. Breaching a closure order can carry penalties of up to A$2.5 million and 20 years in prison.
Sep.10
U.S. Customs Plan to Require Foreign Export Declarations Could Deal ‘Devastating’ Blow to China’s Vape Exports, Logistics gl Expert Says
U.S. Customs Plan to Require Foreign Export Declarations Could Deal ‘Devastating’ Blow to China’s Vape Exports, Logistics gl Expert Says
A U.S. Customs and Border Protection proposal to collect foreign export declarations and other overseas customs documents could expose discrepancies in the value, classification and description of China-made vape shipments entering the United States. A veteran Chinese logistics professional told 2Firsts that the measure, if implemented, could undermine the all-inclusive shipping model used by some unauthorized vape exporters and push parts of the trade toward costlier underground channels. The risk extends beyond higher duties: accurately declared products may also be more readily identified as unauthorized e-cigarettes subject to FDA enforcement.
Special Report
Sep.07
Malaysia Withdraws Appeal Against Liquid Nicotine Ruling as Vape Regulation Framework Enters New Phase
Malaysia Withdraws Appeal Against Liquid Nicotine Ruling as Vape Regulation Framework Enters New Phase
Malaysia’s government has withdrawn its appeal against a High Court ruling concerning the regulatory status of liquid nicotine used in vape and e-cigarette products, according to reports by New Straits Times, Free Malaysia Today and CodeBlue on August 18, 2026. The Kuala Lumpur High Court ruled on May 15 that the government’s decision to remove liquid nicotine from the scheduled poisons list under the Poisons Act 1952 was irrational and made without proper consultation with the Poisons Board. The withdrawal ends the government’s appeal process, while the future regulatory framework for nicotine vape products remains under discussion.
Aug.21
FDA Revises Import Alert 98-07 Rules, Bringing May Enforcement Priorities Into Unauthorized ENDS Detentions
FDA Revises Import Alert 98-07 Rules, Bringing May Enforcement Priorities Into Unauthorized ENDS Detentions
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has revised the rules under Import Alert 98-07 to incorporate its May 2026 enforcement-priority policy for certain electronic nicotine delivery systems marketed without premarket authorization. The alert continues to allow detention without physical examination, or DWPE, for ENDS lacking required marketing authorization, while directing field divisions to apply the May risk-based framework. When necessary, detention or refusal decisions must also undergo review by the FDA's Center for Tobacco Products. Products including PACHA and Vuse Pro have already emerged as industry examples of the May policy, although enforcement discretion does not constitute FDA marketing authorization.
News
Sep.28 by 2Firsts Perspectives
U.S. Military Could Test Nicotine Pouches and Vapes for Smoking Cessation as Washington Examiner Cites ZYN and Potential $4 Billion Reduction in Related Defense Costs
U.S. Military Could Test Nicotine Pouches and Vapes for Smoking Cessation as Washington Examiner Cites ZYN and Potential $4 Billion Reduction in Related Defense Costs
The House-passed FY2027 National Defense Authorization Act includes a provision authorizing the defense secretary to conduct a one-year smoking-cessation pilot for active-duty service members. Section 707 lists counseling, nicotine gum and patches alongside what the bill calls "electric nicotine delivery systems," nicotine pouches and heat-not-burn products. A recent Washington Examiner op-ed cited ZYN as an example in arguing for the provision, but the legislation does not name any commercial brand or supplier. ZYN is made by PMI-owned Swedish Match USA, with specified products holding FDA marketing authorizations and modified risk orders.
Sep.20