KT&G Former Developer Claims 2.1 Billion USD in Patent Rights in World's 1st Vape Technology Appeal

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Apr.24.2024
KT&G Former Developer Claims 2.1 Billion USD in Patent Rights in World's 1st Vape Technology Appeal
Former KT&G researcher Kwak Daeguen sues company for $2.8 trillion over e-cigarette technology, setting record for personal lawsuit amount in South Korea.

According to a report by the Korean news agency Yonhap on April 24th, Kwak Daeguen, a former research and development employee at KT&G, has filed a lawsuit against the company seeking up to 28 trillion Korean won (approximately 2.1 billion USD) in compensation for his invention of the world's first e-cigarette technology. This lawsuit sets a record for the highest amount claimed in a personal lawsuit in South Korea.

 

In the report, Guo Dagen's legal team stated that their compensation claim is based on KT&G's profits gained from Guo Dagen's invention, along with losses incurred by not filing a patent for the invention overseas, totaling 84.9 trillion Korean won. Of this amount, 2.8 trillion Korean won is designated as compensation for the work invention.

 

Mr. Guo Dagen joined the predecessor company of KT&G in 1991, which was then called the Korean Ginseng Tobacco Research Institute. He started developing e-cigarette products in 2005 and created an e-cigarette that could automatically control the heat source. In July 2005, Guo Dagen applied for his first patent, followed by a patent application in December of the following year for a device with automatic heating control. He also developed a pod that was compatible with this device and applied for a patent in June 2007, completing the development of a full set of e-cigarette products including the heat source, device, and pod.

 

Former researcher Guo Dagen claimed that despite inventing the world's first internal-heating e-cigarette from 2005 to 2007 and bringing in huge sales to domestic and international markets, he did not receive fair compensation.

 

Although KT&G took over this invention from Guo Dageun and patented some of the technology in South Korea, the majority of the invention remains unpatented by the KT&G company. Especially overseas, KT&G did not apply for a patent for this technology. Guo Dageun pointed out that despite developing this groundbreaking technology, a globally renowned tobacco company A began selling their internally heated e-cigarette in South Korea in 2017 due to the lack of overseas patents. Guo Dageun stated that he did not receive compensation for this invention, and after leaving his job, he only received an advance payment of 20 million won for a one-year technology consulting fee and a monthly salary of 6.25 million won, which was based solely on the technology consulting agreement.

 

A spokesperson from the law firm Jaeyoo stated, "It is reported that KT&G signed an overseas sales supply contract with a global e-cigarette manufacturer because former researcher Kwak Da-geun holds the world's first patented original technology."

 

On the other hand, Mr. Guo's calculation of compensation is based not only on the company's sales revenue, but also on the detrimental effects caused by the company's failure to apply for overseas patents. Therefore, in addition to the estimated sales revenue of 88 trillion Korean won that Mr. Guo expects to achieve during the 20-year duration of the patent registered in 2007.

 

In response, KT&G stated: "We have already paid appropriate compensation related to employee inventions through a technical consultation contract, which Mr. Guo has accepted and agreed not to raise any further issues." They added, "The situation of the involved patent being applicable has not occurred. If retired individuals who have already received compensation continue to make unfair claims, we plan to take active legal action."

 

Meanwhile, Guo Dagen also requested KT&G to calculate the sales profit of 70.7 trillion Korean won earned by competing companies. He also believes that the 6.7 trillion Korean won profit generated from the transaction with Company A should be included in the compensation for employees.

 

Facing KT&G's statement, Guo Dagen disagrees and states, "The claim that Company A cannot develop a cigarette-shaped e-cigarette if they register the patent overseas is not true." He goes on to say, "At that time, it was difficult to ensure commercial viability, so we did not apply for overseas patents, but the product currently being sold by Company A uses that patent. This is a completely innovative product, with the original cigarette-shaped e-cigarette model being released in 1998," he argued.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

  South Korea Reopens Cigarette Tax Debate as 63% Back Higher Tobacco Taxes
South Korea Reopens Cigarette Tax Debate as 63% Back Higher Tobacco Taxes
South Korea’s cigarette tax debate has resurfaced after the Ministry of Health and Welfare said tobacco price policy needed review, with a poll showing 63% of respondents support higher tobacco taxes.
Regulations
Jun.22
EU Launches Online Feedback as TPD Revision Enters New Milestone
EU Launches Online Feedback as TPD Revision Enters New Milestone
The European Commission has opened an online call for evidence on revising EU tobacco products and advertising rules, marking a new phase in the TPD/TAD review. Policy options may cover novel products, flavours, packaging, digital marketing and advertising. A 2Firsts review of 855 early submissions shows rapid engagement and recurring debate over differentiated regulation, harm reduction, youth protection, illicit trade and economic impact.
Special Report
May.21
U.S. Senator Durbin Criticizes FDA’s First Flavored Vape Authorization, Says Trump Administration Conceded to Big Tobacco
U.S. Senator Durbin Criticizes FDA’s First Flavored Vape Authorization, Says Trump Administration Conceded to Big Tobacco
U.S. Senator Dick Durbin on May 13 criticized the Trump Administration’s Food and Drug Administration for approving the sale and marketing of fruit-flavored e-cigarettes for the first time, while also allowing some illegal vaping products to remain on the market. He also linked the regulatory shift to the departure of FDA Commissioner Marty Makary, saying White House pressure on regulators to approve tobacco product applications could create serious public-health consequences.
Regulations
May.15
Malaysia Police Plan Saliva Tests at Roadblocks to Detect Synthetic Drugs Mixed Into Vape Liquids
Malaysia Police Plan Saliva Tests at Roadblocks to Detect Synthetic Drugs Mixed Into Vape Liquids
Malaysian police plan to use saliva test kits at roadblocks to detect drivers using synthetic liquid drugs marketed as “Piu Piu” and “Magic Mushroom,” substances that authorities say are mixed into vape liquids and inhaled through e-cigarette devices, raising road-safety concerns and adding pressure on vape regulation.
Jun.29
New West Virginia Vape Law Begins, With Packaging and Ad Restrictions Ahead
New West Virginia Vape Law Begins, With Packaging and Ad Restrictions Ahead
West Virginia’s Vape Safety Act will take effect Thursday, requiring vapor products sold in vape and smoke shops to carry health warnings, legal-age notices, manufacturer information and ingredient disclosures, while introducing new licensing and enforcement rules.
Jun.10
Imperial Brands Explains What the UK Tobacco and Vapes Act 2026 Means for Retailers
Imperial Brands Explains What the UK Tobacco and Vapes Act 2026 Means for Retailers
Imperial Brands has outlined what the newly approved UK Tobacco and Vapes Act 2026 means for retailers. The legislation received Royal Assent on April 29, 2026, and gives the Government powers to extend tobacco-style regulation to a wider range of products, including vaping products, heated tobacco, nicotine pouches and cigarette papers. Imperial Brands emphasized that most measures will be introduced in phases rather than taking effect immediately.
May.11 by 2FIRSTS.ai