New York State Files Lawsuit Against E-cigarette Companies for Marketing Flavorful Products

Feb.21.2025
New York State Files Lawsuit Against E-cigarette Companies for Marketing Flavorful Products
New York State sues e-cigarette giants for illegally marketing flavored products to teenagers, demanding billion-dollar penalties.

According to a report by Reuters on February 21st, the state of New York in the United States filed a lawsuit on Thursday (February 20) against several large e-cigarette manufacturers, distributors, and retailers, accusing them of illegally distributing, marketing, and selling flavored disposable e-cigarettes, including well-known brands such as Puff Bar, Elf Bar, Geek Bar, Breeze, and MYLE. The lawsuit alleges that these companies contributed to the trend of youth e-cigarette use by selling products in cartoon-style packaging and flavors like "Baja Slushie," "Strawberry Cereal Donut Milk," and "OMG Blow Pop.

 

New York State Files Lawsuit Against E-cigarette Companies for Marketing Flavorful Products
The Attorney General of New York State accused 13 defendant companies and 3 defendants of selling flavored e-cigarette products that appeal to teenagers. | Image Source: Office of the Attorney General of New York State.

 

According to documents provided by the New York State Attorney General's office, the lawsuit involves a list of manufacturers, distributors, and retailers as follows:

 

  • Puff Bar
  • MYLE Vape
  • Pod Juice
  • Mi-One Brands
  • Happy Distro
  • Demand Vape
  • EVO Brands
  • PVG2
  • Magellan Technology
  • Midwest Goods
  • Safa Goods
  • EVO Brands
  • Price Point Distributors

 

In addition, a lawsuit was filed against the executives of an online e-cigarette retailer, Price Point Distributors, including Weis Khwaja, Hamza Jalili, and Mohammad Jalili.

 

New York State Files Lawsuit Against E-cigarette Companies for Marketing Flavorful Products
The Attorney General of New York State accuses 13 defendant companies and 3 defendants of selling flavored e-cigarette products that appeal to teenagers.  | Image Source: Office of the Attorney General of New York State

 

New York State Files Lawsuit Against E-cigarette Companies for Marketing Flavorful Products

 

New York Attorney General Letitia James announced that she is seeking billions of dollars in civil fines and restitution from 13 defendant companies and 3 individuals, for widespread violations of local, state, and federal laws. The penalties will be aimed at punishing the companies for their illegal actions, compensating for the impact of their misconduct on public health, recovering all proceeds from their unlawful activities, and creating a fund to address the youth e-cigarette crisis in New York.

 

The statement indicates that the defendants knowingly sold fruit and candy-flavored e-cigarette products to vulnerable children, in violation of state laws prohibiting the sale of flavored tobacco products that pose health risks, as well as laws prohibiting the sale of e-cigarettes to individuals under 21 years old in 2020.

 

James said:

 

The e-cigarette industry is mirroring tobacco companies: they are making nicotine look cool, getting kids addicted, and in the process, sparking a large-scale public health crisis.

 

The defendants in the case include ELFBARe-cigarette distributor Demand Vape in Buffalo, New York, and Puff Bar in Gardena, California. These companies are accused of misleading the public through advertising to make flavored e-cigarettes appear as simple recreational products.

 

Demand Vape and Puff Bar did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

 

Many e-cigarette companies promote their products as a traditional cigarette alternative for adults, but since 2014, e-cigarettes have become the most commonly used tobacco product among children in the United States.

 

According to the 2024 Youth Tobacco Survey, 5.9% of middle and high school students (approximately 1.63 million children) reported currently using e-cigarettes, with nearly 90% of users using flavored products.

 

In December, the US Supreme Court heard a case regarding whether the FDA has the authority to prevent two e-cigarette companies from selling flavors such as "Jimmy The Juice Man Peachy Strawberry" and "Suicide Bunny Mother's Milk and Cookies".

 

In January 2024, a federal appeals court ruled that the FDA's decisions were arbitrary and inconsistent, although seven other federal appeals courts had previously supported the agency in similar cases. Regardless of the final outcome, Democratic lawmaker James is attempting to close regulatory loopholes through legislation to prevent the FDA from backtracking on regulation.

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Russia’s Public Chamber official opposes “generational ban” on tobacco sales, citing rights concerns
Russia’s Public Chamber official opposes “generational ban” on tobacco sales, citing rights concerns
Vladislav Grib, deputy secretary of the Public Chamber of the Russian Federation, said a “generational ban” on cigarette sales—restricting sales based on year of birth—would not resolve smoking and would instead lead to human rights violations. He argued older cohorts would buy and share, and the approach would split citizens into two categories.
Jan.08 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Consultation opens for Tasmania’s Public Health Amendment Bill 2026
Consultation opens for Tasmania’s Public Health Amendment Bill 2026
Consultation opened on February 6, 2026 for the Public Health Amendment (Prohibited Tobacco and Other Products) Bill 2026. The Bill intends to address illicit trade in tobacco, nicotine pouches and e-cigarettes, which has increased significantly across Tasmania in recent years. It proposes changes to the Public Health Act 1997 to further protect the health of Tasmanians by reducing the sale and supply of illicit tobacco, vaping and other products, and to strengthen existing tobacco control laws.
Feb.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai
New York directs Tax and Finance to build “Vapor Products” registry; products not listed deemed illegal
New York directs Tax and Finance to build “Vapor Products” registry; products not listed deemed illegal
New York Gov. Kathy Hochul says the state will crack down on illegal flavored vapes by creating a registry identifying which vapor products may be legally sold. The governor directed the state Department of Taxation and Finance to establish a “Vapor Products” registry, with products not on the list treated as illegal.
Jan.20 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Brazil’s federal prosecutors sue for strict e-cigarette rules, urging regulation over a “paper ban”
Brazil’s federal prosecutors sue for strict e-cigarette rules, urging regulation over a “paper ban”
Brazil’s Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office (MPF) has filed a public civil action seeking to compel the federal government and Anvisa to establish a strict, enforceable regulatory framework for electronic smoking devices, replacing the current blanket ban. The lawsuit calls for mandatory product registration, nicotine caps, bans on youth-targeted advertising, and clear health warnings on packaging, and demands a national consumption report and an implementation timetable within 90 days.
Jan.30 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Mexico to impose an absolute ban on the commercialization, import and sale of vapes from Jan. 16, 2026
Mexico to impose an absolute ban on the commercialization, import and sale of vapes from Jan. 16, 2026
Mexico will enforce an absolute ban on the commercialization, import and sale of vapes and e-cigarettes from January 16, 2026, under a reform published in the Official Journal of the Federation (DOF) amending the General Health Law.
Jan.16 by 2FIRSTS.ai
UPC Court of Appeal refuses to revive VMR’s European vape patent, upholding lack of inventiveness
UPC Court of Appeal refuses to revive VMR’s European vape patent, upholding lack of inventiveness
The Unified Patent Court’s Court of Appeal declined on Dec. 29 to revive a European patent held by VMR Products LLC, upholding a finding that the patent is not inventive over earlier devices. The decision said adding a window in the vape’s outer shell to reveal the internal cartridge holding vape liquid was an obvious, routine adaptation based on an earlier U.S. patent and general knowledge.
Jan.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai