San Francisco Attorney Files Lawsuit Against Online Retailers for Illegal Sales of Flavored E-cigs and Tobacco Products

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Dec.07.2023
San Francisco Attorney Files Lawsuit Against Online Retailers for Illegal Sales of Flavored E-cigs and Tobacco Products
San Francisco lawyers have filed a lawsuit against three online retailers for illegally selling flavored e-cigarettes and tobacco products in the city.

According to a report by the SF Examiner on December 6th, attorneys in San Francisco have filed lawsuits against three online retailers for illegally selling flavored e-cigarettes and tobacco products in the city.

 

David Chiu, an attorney from San Francisco, stated in a press conference on Tuesday that three companies, Gashiro Technology LLC, DaSmokey LLC, and Millennial One Inc., are facing legal action for violating California state laws by selling flavored tobacco products and flavored e-cigarette products to consumers through online channels.

 

In 2020, Governor Gavin Newsom signed a widely popular law that prohibits the sale of flavored tobacco products.

 

Qu stated, "We are filing this lawsuit in order to send a clear message to tobacco retailers that their products cannot be sold in San Francisco."

 

Mr. Qiu stated that his office has placed orders and obtained disposable e-cigarettes in fruit and dessert flavors from these three sellers, targeting young people. The city attorney added that these companies have violated the law by shipping these products to San Francisco.

 

The three companies accused in the lawsuit have not explicitly stated on their websites that they will not deliver their products to places like California, where the sale of flavored products is prohibited.

 

In 2017, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors became the first city in the country to ban the sale of flavored products such as menthol cigarettes and flavored e-cigarettes. The ban was reaffirmed by the citizens through a vote in June of the following year and took effect one month later.

 

In 2020, legislators in California followed in the footsteps of San Francisco, as mere hours after the bill was passed in August of that year, it was signed into law in Nutham.

 

This state law has been a subject of intense debate among vested companies. Tobacco companies R.J. Reynolds, Philip Morris, and ITG Brands backed a ballot measure for 2022 in an attempt to overturn this legislation, but the Supreme Court has made a ruling against it.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Comedian Shuib fined  US$2,460 after pleading guilty to promoting an e-cigarette on a podcast
Comedian Shuib fined US$2,460 after pleading guilty to promoting an e-cigarette on a podcast
Bernama reported that comedian Shahmira Muhamad, better known as Shuib Sepahtu, was fined RM10,000 (about US$2,460.93) after pleading guilty to promoting an electronic cigarette product on a YouTube podcast in 2024. The magistrate ordered one month’s jail in default of payment, and he paid the fine. He was charged over a promotion at 4.26pm on Oct 22, 2024, under Section 9(1) of the Control of Smoking Products for Public Health Act 2024 (Act 852).
Jan.08 by 2FIRSTS.ai
British Columbia Sues Juul Over Youth Nicotine Addiction
British Columbia Sues Juul Over Youth Nicotine Addiction
British Columbia has filed a civil lawsuit against Juul Labs, alleging the company fuelled youth nicotine addiction through highly addictive products and deceptive marketing practices. The claim was submitted to the B.C. Supreme Court under the newly enacted Vaping Product Damages and Health Care Costs Recovery Act.
Dec.15 by 2FIRSTS.ai
U.S. FDA posts TPSAC meeting materials ahead of discussion on ZYN MRTP applications
U.S. FDA posts TPSAC meeting materials ahead of discussion on ZYN MRTP applications
On January 20, 2026, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) posted meeting materials ahead of a virtual Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee (TPSAC) meeting scheduled for January 22, 2026, to discuss modified risk tobacco product (MRTP) applications submitted by Swedish Match USA, Inc. for 20 ZYN nicotine pouch products.
Jan.21 by 2FIRSTS.ai
France drops a vaping clause from the 2026 finance bill after use of Article 49.3
France drops a vaping clause from the 2026 finance bill after use of Article 49.3
A provision in France’s 2026 finance bill intended to regulate vaping products was abandoned after Sébastien Lecornu used Article 49.3 on January 20 to commit the government’s responsibility on the “revenue” section of the state budget.
Jan.21 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Philippine BIR Will Destroys Nearly 450,000 Illicit Vape Products Over Unpaid Taxes
Philippine BIR Will Destroys Nearly 450,000 Illicit Vape Products Over Unpaid Taxes
The Philippine Bureau of Internal Revenue has led a nationwide destruction of illicit vape products, citing unpaid excise taxes and penalties amounting to 1.34 billion pesos(approximately US$22 million). Nearly 450,000 units are scheduled for destruction over three days across multiple revenue regions. The seized products violated excise tax laws due to non-payment of taxes, lack of internal revenue stamps, and non-registration of vape brands.
Dec.15 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Russian State Duma Passes Ban on Tobacco and Vape Sales at Public Transport Stops
Russian State Duma Passes Ban on Tobacco and Vape Sales at Public Transport Stops
Russia’s State Duma has approved, in its third reading, a law banning the sale of cigarettes and electronic cigarettes at public transport stops. The measure expands existing restrictions on tobacco sales at transport infrastructure facilities and aims to reduce accessibility, particularly among young people. The law includes an exemption for small settlements where such kiosks are the only sales points and will take effect on September 1, 2026.
Dec.18 by 2FIRSTS.ai