Texas Court to Hear LG Battery Explosion Injury Case

Feb.28.2023
Texas Court to Hear LG Battery Explosion Injury Case
LG Chemical faces US court jurisdiction dispute over exploding e-cigarette battery case in Texas court.

According to a Law360 report, the Supreme Court of Texas (referred to as "Texas" below) has agreed to hear a case against LG Chem and LG Chem America. The case involves an e-cigarette user who was injured due to an LG battery explosion. It will decide whether Texas courts have jurisdiction over LG Chem. LG Chem is headquartered in South Korea, with LG Chem America being its subsidiary.


The focus of this case is that the jurisdiction of the United States states is under the framework of federal law. States cannot exercise jurisdiction over judicial matters that do not belong to their state. LG Chemical's batteries are not directly distributed nationwide, so areas without direct distribution cannot exercise jurisdiction.


In 2016, Texan resident Tommy Morgan purchased an electronic cigarette which utilized an LG Chemical-manufactured 18650 lithium-ion battery. According to a lawsuit he filed in 2019 in Brazoria County Court, he claims that the battery in the e-cigarette exploded and caught fire unexpectedly, resulting in permanent injuries.


The company is also facing similar battery explosion lawsuits from Texas residents. However, the intermediate appeals court has come to a different conclusion regarding whether LG Chemical has sufficient contacts in the state to respond to the claims of victims, specifically regarding direct benefit from e-cigarette sales.


LG Chem USA and LG Chem assert that the Texas court lacks jurisdiction because these companies have not sold any individual batteries in Texas or sold directly to customers in the state.


LG Chem | Image Source: LG Chem Official Website.


It is understood that this is not the first time that LG Chemical has faced a similar lawsuit.


In Mississippi, the Dilworth couple has claimed that an electronic cigarette battery exploded while walking their dog, causing Mrs. Dilworth to suffer second and third degree burns. The battery was purchased separately from a local Mississippi e-cigarette store without any warnings or instructions.


The Dilworths have initiated a lawsuit including LG Chem, but it has encountered issues related to jurisdiction. LG Chem argued that Mississippi does not have personal jurisdiction over the company (see related article at the end), as it does not sell batteries for electronic cigarettes in Mississippi. The district court rejected the lawsuit filed by the Dilworths.


The Dilworth couple kept appealing and finally, on October 13th, 2022, the Mississippi Supreme Court ruled that they can sue LG Chem in Mississippi.


In Ohio, Paul Straight purchased an e-cigarette from a vape store which exploded, burning through his jeans and left thigh. He subsequently sued LG Chem. However, the Ohio court ruled in favor of LG, dismissing the case.


The state judge believed that LG Chem had confirmed that they had not received any revenue from the sale or distribution of 18650 batteries in Ohio, nor had they advertised or solicited business for these batteries in Ohio.


According to anonymous sources cited by 2FIRSTS, LG and Samsung have both been insisting that their batteries cannot be used in e-cigarette products. Additionally, LG's 18650 batteries are encased in steel and therefore intrinsically risky.


In fact, LG's significant market share in the e-cigarette battery market has given them extensive experience in dealing with lawsuits. According to Market.us' 2022 global e-cigarette lithium battery market segmentation percentage list, Korean company LG ranks fourth globally, with the top three being Samsung of Korea, Sony of Japan, and Matsushita.


According to a report from the legal news website Legal Newsline, LG Chem is currently facing at least 44 similar lawsuits across the United States as of October 2022. Despite this, LG Chem has maintained the same defense in each of these cases, arguing that their 18650 batteries were never intended for use in e-cigarettes or other inhalation devices.


Consumers, however, clearly do not agree with this argument. Morgan, who filed a lawsuit in the Texas High Court, stated that "LG Chemical deliberately shipped products to customers in Texas (which caused consumer burns), therefore Texas courts have jurisdiction.


Related reading:


LG Electronics has been acquitted after being accused in a case of battery explosion.


A South Korean electronic cigarette battery manufacturer has been sued in Mississippi, USA.


A court in Texas will hear a case concerning exploding batteries.


Further Reading:


Personal Jurisdiction refers to the interpretation of the law in the United States.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Product | JT to Launch MEVIUS Tropical Option in Japan, Expanding Ploom Tobacco Stick Lineup to 32
Product | JT to Launch MEVIUS Tropical Option in Japan, Expanding Ploom Tobacco Stick Lineup to 32
Japan Tobacco (JT) will launch MEVIUS Tropical Option, a new tobacco stick for Ploom, nationwide in Japan from October 6, 2026. The capsule-format product combines mango-oriented sweetness with menthol cooling, adding a tropical flavor to the MEVIUS Ploom tobacco-stick lineup for the first time. Each pack contains 20 sticks and will launch at JPY 590. The product is compatible with all Ploom devices, and its addition will expand the Ploom tobacco-stick portfolio to 32 variants.
Sep.08
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company Launches Flavored Vuse Pro Pods in U.S. Without FDA Marketing Authorization
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company Launches Flavored Vuse Pro Pods in U.S. Without FDA Marketing Authorization
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company has begun selling four flavored Vuse Pro pods — Peach, Berry, Watermelon and Fresh Mint — in Ohio and selected other U.S. markets. According to the Vuse U.S. FAQ, Vuse Pro contains approximately 5.0% nicotine by weight, and Vuse Pro pre-filled pods are intended for use with Vuse Alto devices. Reynolds told 2Firsts that product labeling lists an e-liquid capacity of 2.0 mL per pod. The Vuse Alto Power Unit received FDA marketing authorization in 2024, while the new Vuse Pro pods themselves have not received marketing granted orders. The rollout follows the FDA’s May 2026 revision of enforcement priorities for certain unauthorized vaping products with qualifying pending applications.
BAT
Sep.10
STIIIZY Redesign Fails to Escape PAX Labs Patent Import Ban as Section 337 Case Also Involves China ALD
STIIIZY Redesign Fails to Escape PAX Labs Patent Import Ban as Section 337 Case Also Involves China ALD
U.S. Customs and Border Protection ruled that STIIIZY had not shown that the redesigned cannabis-vape products covered by its latest request fall outside an ITC limited exclusion order tied to PAX Labs patents. CBP accepted some of STIIIZY’s claim-construction and non-infringement arguments, but the company did not address two additional claims in the same patent. Earlier STIIIZY redesigned cartridges and certain associated components imported with them had received separate CBP clearance.
Sep.16
As FDA Reshapes PMTA Reviews and ENDS Enforcement Priorities, CTP Acting Director Bret Koplow to Keynote NATO Event for a Retail Network of 66,000-Plus Stores
As FDA Reshapes PMTA Reviews and ENDS Enforcement Priorities, CTP Acting Director Bret Koplow to Keynote NATO Event for a Retail Network of 66,000-Plus Stores
Bret Koplow, acting director of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Center for Tobacco Products, will deliver a keynote and participate in a fireside chat at the National Association of Tobacco Outlets' Sept. 29-30 conference in Washington. His appearance comes months after the FDA moved to accelerate PMTA reviews and introduced a more differentiated enforcement policy for certain unauthorized ENDS and oral nicotine pouch products. The agency also plans a public list identifying manufacturers and products it does not currently intend to prioritize for enforcement under the May guidance. NATO says its membership includes more than 66,000 retail stores, making product-status transparency and enforcement boundaries directly relevant to the retail sector.
Aug.14
Reynolds Seeks to Join Altria Lawsuit Challenging FDA PMTA Rule and Calculation of 180-Day Deadline
Reynolds Seeks to Join Altria Lawsuit Challenging FDA PMTA Rule and Calculation of 180-Day Deadline
Three R.J. Reynolds companies are seeking to intervene in a lawsuit filed by Altria subsidiaries Helix Innovations and NJOY challenging the FDA's 2021 PMTA final rule. The companies dispute how the agency uses Acceptance and Filing reviews and completeness determinations to establish when the Tobacco Control Act's 180-day decision period begins. Reynolds has also linked prolonged PMTA reviews to competition from unauthorized vaping products. The FDA, meanwhile, has been accelerating reviews and reducing its backlog.
Sep.14
InterTabac 2026: Further Sessions on Regulation, Market Access and Innovation Confirmed; 2FIRSTS to Host China Market Forum
InterTabac 2026: Further Sessions on Regulation, Market Access and Innovation Confirmed; 2FIRSTS to Host China Market Forum
InterTabac 2026 will bring together international experts to discuss European regulation, tax policy, Track & Trace, market access, retail impacts, consumer behavior and innovation. Sessions will also examine Poland’s tobacco-growing perspective and the growing fragmentation of Europe’s tobacco and nicotine market. Media partner 2FIRSTS will host the second “2FIRSTS Connect at InterTabac” on September 16, focusing on developments in China’s tobacco and nicotine industry.
Aug.06