US Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments on RJR Vapor-FDA Dispute

Jan.23.2025
US Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments on RJR Vapor-FDA Dispute
Tobacco Reporter: US Supreme Court hears oral arguments between RJR Vapor and FDA over jurisdictional issue.

According to a report from Tobacco Reporter on January 21st, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Tuesday (21st) between British American Tobacco subsidiary RJR Vapor and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).


The FDA claims that the Tobacco Control Act allows cases to be tried in the District of Columbia Circuit Court, the jurisdiction where the plaintiff is located, or their primary place of business. However, the British-American Tobacco subsidiary, RJR Vapor, is attempting to challenge the FDA in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in Louisiana.


RJR Vapor has teamed up with retailer Avail Vapor in Texas and a convenience store association in Mississippi that sells RJR products to submit a request for a review. Both states are in the Fifth Circuit.


The North Carolina headquarters of RJR Vapor falls under the Fourth Circuit, where an appeal against the FDA's rejection of their application has been dismissed. The Fifth Circuit Court had criticized the FDA for making it nearly impossible for companies to comply with regulations, calling it a "needle in a haystack" situation. RJR Vapor and retailers argue that regulations allow "any adversely affected person" to challenge the FDA, including retailers in the Fifth Circuit who may face closure risks due to selling Vuse products.


In 2016, the FDA rejected RJR Vapor's application, stating that the product was "not appropriate for protecting public health." The FDA believed that their decision primarily targeted manufacturers and had an indirect and insignificant impact on retailers. Allowing this case to be heard in the Fifth Circuit could potentially lead to regulatory evasion and encourage "forum shopping.


As a result, the FDA has filed a petition with the Supreme Court to review the case, and the Supreme Court agreed to hear it in October 2024. RJR Vapor argues that the Supreme Court does not have the authority to rule on such a "non-final" case and hopes that it will be dismissed while still pending.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

ACT Health Minister Vows Continued Crackdown on E-Cigarettes and Illicit Tobacco
ACT Health Minister Vows Continued Crackdown on E-Cigarettes and Illicit Tobacco
ACT Health Minister Rachel Stephen-Smith said the government would not ease its action against e-cigarettes and illicit tobacco and would continue strengthening regulation, legislation, and enforcement. Speaking at the launch of a new program to help young people quit vaping, she said reducing tobacco excise would not materially reduce profits in the illicit tobacco market.
Mar.10 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Aurora advances retail tobacco licensing ordinance to curb under-21 access to vapes and tobacco
Aurora advances retail tobacco licensing ordinance to curb under-21 access to vapes and tobacco
The Denver Post reported that Aurora’s City Council unanimously approved a retail tobacco licensure ordinance on first reading Monday night to reduce underage access to tobacco products, including e-cigarettes and vaping cartridges. The ordinance would stiffen fines for businesses that sell to people under 21 and tighten rules on where tobacco retailers can locate in the city.
Feb.26 by 2FIRSTS.ai
HB 5437 “Vape Safety Act” advances in House committee, proposing statewide licensing for vape shops
HB 5437 “Vape Safety Act” advances in House committee, proposing statewide licensing for vape shops
A committee substitute for House Bill 5437, the Vape Safety Act sponsored by Del. David McCormick (David McCormick), was recommended Monday afternoon by the House Health and Human Resources Committee to the full House, with the bill next heading to the House Judiciary Committee. HB 5437 would require specialty shops selling tobacco, tobacco-derived products, alternative nicotine, or vapor products and accessories to obtain a state license from the Alcohol Beverage Control Administration (ABCA)
Feb.26 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Glasgow bin lorry fires spark calls to broaden vape and battery disposal messaging
Glasgow bin lorry fires spark calls to broaden vape and battery disposal messaging
Glasgow residents have been warned that throwing batteries and vapes away at home can endanger refuse workers, amid bin lorries catching fire. The city council said it will launch a communications campaign next month to tell people to place batteries in special bins at supermarkets or household waste recycling centres, supported by a dedicated web page listing other disposal sites.
Feb.11 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Report says illegal vapes “threaten UK high streets” as 55% of councils seized thousands last year
Report says illegal vapes “threaten UK high streets” as 55% of councils seized thousands last year
The latest annual Illegal Vapes and Nicotine Product Report says nearly 5 million illegal vapes have been seized over the last three years—equivalent to three seized every minute—with a street value of £39m (USD equivalent not provided in the source; exchange-rate basis not stated). It says 1.3 million were seized last year and that 55% of UK council areas seized thousands of illegal products over the year.
Feb.26 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Reynolds Appeals ITC Defeat in Disposable Vape Section 337 Case to U.S. Federal Circuit
Reynolds Appeals ITC Defeat in Disposable Vape Section 337 Case to U.S. Federal Circuit
On March 13, 2026, R.J. Reynolds and related companies filed an appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, seeking review of the U.S. International Trade Commission’s final ruling in the disposable vape Section 337 investigation.
Mar.16 by 2FIRSTS.ai