US Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments on RJR Vapor-FDA Dispute

Jan.23.2025
US Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments on RJR Vapor-FDA Dispute
Tobacco Reporter: US Supreme Court hears oral arguments between RJR Vapor and FDA over jurisdictional issue.

According to a report from Tobacco Reporter on January 21st, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Tuesday (21st) between British American Tobacco subsidiary RJR Vapor and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).


The FDA claims that the Tobacco Control Act allows cases to be tried in the District of Columbia Circuit Court, the jurisdiction where the plaintiff is located, or their primary place of business. However, the British-American Tobacco subsidiary, RJR Vapor, is attempting to challenge the FDA in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in Louisiana.


RJR Vapor has teamed up with retailer Avail Vapor in Texas and a convenience store association in Mississippi that sells RJR products to submit a request for a review. Both states are in the Fifth Circuit.


The North Carolina headquarters of RJR Vapor falls under the Fourth Circuit, where an appeal against the FDA's rejection of their application has been dismissed. The Fifth Circuit Court had criticized the FDA for making it nearly impossible for companies to comply with regulations, calling it a "needle in a haystack" situation. RJR Vapor and retailers argue that regulations allow "any adversely affected person" to challenge the FDA, including retailers in the Fifth Circuit who may face closure risks due to selling Vuse products.


In 2016, the FDA rejected RJR Vapor's application, stating that the product was "not appropriate for protecting public health." The FDA believed that their decision primarily targeted manufacturers and had an indirect and insignificant impact on retailers. Allowing this case to be heard in the Fifth Circuit could potentially lead to regulatory evasion and encourage "forum shopping.


As a result, the FDA has filed a petition with the Supreme Court to review the case, and the Supreme Court agreed to hear it in October 2024. RJR Vapor argues that the Supreme Court does not have the authority to rule on such a "non-final" case and hopes that it will be dismissed while still pending.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Multi-agency crackdown targets vape and convenience stores across Wirral, seizing illegal cigarettes and non-compliant pods
Multi-agency crackdown targets vape and convenience stores across Wirral, seizing illegal cigarettes and non-compliant pods
A multi-agency, intelligence-led enforcement operation took place on January 27, 2026, targeting vape and convenience stores across Wirral, including West Kirby, to disrupt the supply of illegal tobacco and vaping products. Six premises were inspected, with approximately 10,500 illegal cigarettes seized along with vape pods that were not in original packaging or did not meet UK regulatory requirements.
Feb.05 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Russia proposes extending voluntary labeling pilot for reusable e-cigarettes to Aug. 31, 2026
Russia proposes extending voluntary labeling pilot for reusable e-cigarettes to Aug. 31, 2026
Russia’s Ministry of Industry and Trade has proposed extending a voluntary labeling pilot covering reusable e-cigarettes and similar personal electric vaporizing devices until August 31, 2026. A draft government decree has been published on the unified portal for posting drafts of normative legal acts.
Jan.22 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Alabama Senate Passes SB9 to Ban Vaping in Indoor Public Places
Alabama Senate Passes SB9 to Ban Vaping in Indoor Public Places
Alabama’s Senate approved SB9 by a 31–1 vote, expanding existing indoor smoking restrictions to include vaping in a wide range of public places. The bill keeps the current $25 fine, renames the state’s Clean Indoor Air Act, and now heads to the House. If enacted, it would take effect on Oct. 1, 2026.
Feb.02 by 2FIRSTS.ai
DTI drafts administrative order proposing an open-pod and e-liquid ban and opens it for public consultation
DTI drafts administrative order proposing an open-pod and e-liquid ban and opens it for public consultation
Department of Trade and Industry’s (DTI) proposed move to restrict harmful vape products to protect young people, but said only a total ban on all vaping and novel tobacco products would effectively safeguard public health. The group warned that limiting rules to certain products such as open pods and e-liquids could create a “dangerous behavioral loophole,” leading users—especially youth—to switch to disposable or closed-system alternatives instead of quitting.
Feb.10 by 2FIRSTS.ai
KDCA youth panel: health indicators worsen with grade level; liquid e-cigarette use tops cigarettes among 11th-grade students
KDCA youth panel: health indicators worsen with grade level; liquid e-cigarette use tops cigarettes among 11th-grade students
Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency’s Youth Health Panel Survey (2025) Final Results Report says key adolescent health indicators worsen as students move up grade levels. By 11th grade, lifetime tobacco experience rose to 9.59%. Among 11th-grade girls, current use of liquid e-cigarettes (1.54%) surpassed conventional cigarettes (1.33%) for the first time.
Feb.10 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Arizona e-cigarette shops ordered to pay $460,000 for selling tobacco and nicotine products to minors
Arizona e-cigarette shops ordered to pay $460,000 for selling tobacco and nicotine products to minors
Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes announced Pro Source Supply LLC, Pro Source Vapes LLC, Pro Source CBD LLC, and owner Timothy Kell must pay $460,000 in restitution tied to a lawsuit filed last year alleging illegal sales of tobacco and nicotine products to underage buyers.
Jan.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai