Appeals Court Upholds Washington County Flavor Tobacco Ban Ruling

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
May.06.2024
Appeals Court Upholds Washington County Flavor Tobacco Ban Ruling
Oregon Appeals Court upholds Washington County's ban on flavored tobacco and nicotine sales, despite legal challenge.

According to a recent report by Koin, the US Court of Appeals for Oregon recently issued a ruling upholding Washington County's complete ban on flavored tobacco and nicotine. The court stated that the county's ordinance does not conflict with state law.

 

In November 2021, the county committee enacted a flavor ban on tobacco products for the first time with a vote of 3 to 2. Regulation number 878 initially took effect in December 2021, and is expected to be enforced in January of the following year.

 

In January 2022, the county announced that residents had collected enough signatures to put the ban on hold and add it to the next ballot. In the following primary election, the ordinance again received support from 75% of voters and was passed. Subsequently, after tobacco companies affected by the ban took legal action against Washington County, officials issued a stay on the ban. In September, Circuit Court Judge Andrew Erwin made a ruling in favor of these companies, stating that the county did not have the authority to override the state and prohibit the sale of flavored tobacco.

 

Tony Aiello Jr., the lawyer representing the state's Tobacco and E-Cigarette Retailers Association, expressed disappointment with the ruling, stating that the case will continue to be appealed to the Oregon Supreme Court.

 

We have read that the rulings of the appellate court are contradictory in several places. We are optimistic that if our case is granted review, the Oregon Supreme Court will reach a different conclusion.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

DTI drafts administrative order proposing an open-pod and e-liquid ban and opens it for public consultation
DTI drafts administrative order proposing an open-pod and e-liquid ban and opens it for public consultation
Department of Trade and Industry’s (DTI) proposed move to restrict harmful vape products to protect young people, but said only a total ban on all vaping and novel tobacco products would effectively safeguard public health. The group warned that limiting rules to certain products such as open pods and e-liquids could create a “dangerous behavioral loophole,” leading users—especially youth—to switch to disposable or closed-system alternatives instead of quitting.
Feb.10 by 2FIRSTS.ai
KDCA youth panel: health indicators worsen with grade level; liquid e-cigarette use tops cigarettes among 11th-grade students
KDCA youth panel: health indicators worsen with grade level; liquid e-cigarette use tops cigarettes among 11th-grade students
Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency’s Youth Health Panel Survey (2025) Final Results Report says key adolescent health indicators worsen as students move up grade levels. By 11th grade, lifetime tobacco experience rose to 9.59%. Among 11th-grade girls, current use of liquid e-cigarettes (1.54%) surpassed conventional cigarettes (1.33%) for the first time.
Feb.10 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Brazil’s federal prosecutors sue for strict e-cigarette rules, urging regulation over a “paper ban”
Brazil’s federal prosecutors sue for strict e-cigarette rules, urging regulation over a “paper ban”
Brazil’s Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office (MPF) has filed a public civil action seeking to compel the federal government and Anvisa to establish a strict, enforceable regulatory framework for electronic smoking devices, replacing the current blanket ban. The lawsuit calls for mandatory product registration, nicotine caps, bans on youth-targeted advertising, and clear health warnings on packaging, and demands a national consumption report and an implementation timetable within 90 days.
Jan.30 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Perak to stop issuing new vape licences, aiming for a phased “zero sales” outcome after October
Perak to stop issuing new vape licences, aiming for a phased “zero sales” outcome after October
Perak executive councillor Datuk Sivanesan said the state government aims to progressively reach a “zero” level of vape sales no later than after October, noting vape operators were clearly informed in October 2025.
Jan.05 by 2FIRSTS.ai
2Firsts Interview | Bengt Wiberg: Why the Oral Health Risks of Nicotine Pouches Merit Further Study
2Firsts Interview | Bengt Wiberg: Why the Oral Health Risks of Nicotine Pouches Merit Further Study
As nicotine pouches gain global traction as a lower-risk alternative to smoking, questions are emerging about their potential oral health effects. In a 2Firsts interview, Stingfree AB founder Bengt Wiberg discusses why gum irritation and oral lesions warrant closer scrutiny within the broader framework of tobacco harm reduction.
Jan.06
UK Guernsey's QuitVape program for youth e-cigarette cessation to end at the end of the month
UK Guernsey's QuitVape program for youth e-cigarette cessation to end at the end of the month
QuitVape e-cigarette quitting service for teens in Guernsey to end this month, after six-month trial period.
Dec.29 by 2FIRSTS.ai