Indonesian E-cigarette Association Opposes Proposed Tax Implementation

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Dec.29.2023
Indonesian E-cigarette Association Opposes Proposed Tax Implementation
Indonesia's e-cigarette association, Pavenas, opposes the government's plan to implement e-cigarette tax in 2024.

According to a report by Jakarta News on December 29th, the Indonesian E-Cigarette National Association (Pavenas) opposes the e-cigarette tax plan proposed by the Indonesian Ministry of Finance, which is set to be implemented in 2024.

 

The association is composed of various organizations including the Indonesian Personal E-cigarette Association (APVI), the Indonesian Vape Alliance (AVI), the Indonesian E-liquid Manufacturers Association (PPEI), the Indonesian Electronic Nicotine Business Alliance (APPNINDO), and the Bali Vape Device Association (AVB).

 

The association expressed discontent with the decision to impose taxation on e-cigarettes during a meeting on December 27. They believe that the government has disregarded the industry's opinion and the sustainability of businesses, and they are considering legal measures to address the impending tax policy.

 

The Secretary-General of APVI, Garindra Kartasasmita, expressed deep shock at the decision made by the Ministry of Finance in a statement. He pointed out that businesses were only provided with the online briefing link at the last minute and did not have enough time to prepare. Kartasasmita stated, "We were informed that the government has decided to impose e-cigarette taxes starting from January 1, 2024. This unilateral decision has had a direct impact on our business, which we cannot accept.

 

The Pavenas Association has stated that they have previously sent two written letters to the Ministry of Finance, requesting a meeting to discuss the issue of e-cigarette taxation, but have never received a response. As a result, they have decided to directly inquire with the Ministry of Finance on December 21, 2023, demanding an explanation and transparency.

 

The personal e-cigarette industry in Indonesia is urging the government to provide ample time to prepare for the potential additional burden imposed. Elmo Eliando, the industry leader of the Indonesian Personal E-Cigarette Association, warned that the majority of e-cigarette businesses are small and micro enterprises that would require starting from scratch. He expressed surprise at the government's decision, especially considering the Finance Ministry's previous commitment to delay the implementation of e-cigarette taxes until 2026.

 

The Minister of the Department of Organization of the Indonesian E-cigarette Community (DPP APVI), Hasiholan Manurung, has also lodged a protest with the Ministry of Finance, specifically with the Directorate General of Taxes (DJPK), demanding the implementation of e-cigarette taxes be postponed until 2027. He stated that this is in line with the practice of traditional cigarette tax, which provided a five-year transition period and did not raise the tax rate during the initial implementation. The Minister of the DPP APVI's Organization Department stated that the current tax implementation process is hasty and fails to fully consider the industry's needs. If the government continues to forcefully implement the new tax scheme, legal measures will be considered for asserting their rights.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

South Korea Constitutional Court Upholds Volume-Based E-Liquid Tax, With Challenged Rates at KRW 370 and KRW 628 per Milliliter
South Korea Constitutional Court Upholds Volume-Based E-Liquid Tax, With Challenged Rates at KRW 370 and KRW 628 per Milliliter
South Korea's Constitutional Court has upheld fixed taxes on nicotine-containing e-cigarette liquids based on solution volume, ruling that challenged provisions imposing KRW 370 per milliliter in individual consumption tax and KRW 628 per milliliter in tobacco consumption tax do not violate the Constitution. The cases stemmed from historical disputes involving importers that reported nicotine as being extracted from tobacco stems rather than leaves. South Korea has since broadened its tobacco definition to include synthetic nicotine, while current tax laws provide reduced rates for certain products not derived from tobacco.
Sep.18
Product | DOJO Launches BLAST10K Fresh in UK With 0+10ml E-Liquid Structure, Retaining 2+8ml Pod Compatibility
Product | DOJO Launches BLAST10K Fresh in UK With 0+10ml E-Liquid Structure, Retaining 2+8ml Pod Compatibility
DOJO launched the BLAST10K Fresh in the UK on September 4, 2026, introducing its INSTA-JUICED™ technology and a new 0+10ml structure that keeps e-liquid separated from the coil before activation. The device features a 1000mAh rechargeable battery, COREX BLAST dual-mesh technology and SSS leak-resistant technology, with a manufacturer-rated capacity of up to 10,000 puffs. It also retains compatibility with existing 2+8ml pods across the BLAST ecosystem. The launch introduces eight new flavors, including Matcha Strawberry, which DOJO describes as an industry first.
Market
Sep.04
From Nicotine Salts to Cocrystals: China’s Shenzhen Huabao institute explores a more stable form for sustained nicotine release
From Nicotine Salts to Cocrystals: China’s Shenzhen Huabao institute explores a more stable form for sustained nicotine release
China-based Shenzhen Huabao Collaborative Innovation Technology Research Institute Co., Ltd. has filed a patent application for a nicotine-ascorbic acid cocrystal, exploring a new solid-state form of nicotine. The patent proposes applications across e-liquids, heated tobacco sticks, oral tobacco, chewing tobacco and snuff. In nicotine pouch tests disclosed in the filing, cocrystal formulations showed less than a 6% decline in nicotine content after three months of accelerated storage and a release profile combining early-stage release with sustained delivery over 60 minutes. The filing reflects exploration of nicotine forms beyond conventional nicotine base and nicotine salts.
Aug.13
U.S. Ninth Circuit Upholds FDA Denial of MH Global’s Flavored Vape PMTA Applications
U.S. Ninth Circuit Upholds FDA Denial of MH Global’s Flavored Vape PMTA Applications
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the FDA’s denial of MH Global LLC’s applications to market flavored electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). The court ruled that FDA’s comparative-efficacy framework, which requires applicants to show that flavored products provide greater cessation or switching benefits than tobacco-flavored alternatives, is consistent with the Tobacco Control Act’s “appropriate for the protection of the public health” standard. The court also found that FDA was not required to establish the framework through notice-and-comment rulemaking.
Aug.26
JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
Less than a week after JUUL2 received U.S. FDA marketing authorization on August 28, 2026, JUUL Labs was sued for patent infringement in federal court in Delaware. AJ Marketing LLC filed the complaint on September 3, alleging that both JUUL 1 and JUUL2 infringe U.S. Patent No. 8,851,068 B2. The patent covers aspects of programmable electronic vaporization devices, including controls over dose delivery, usage frequency and operating parameters. The plaintiff is seeking reasonable royalties and ongoing royalties tied to the remaining life of the patent. JUUL has not yet publicly responded to the case.
Sep.10
Arizona Turns to a 50% Retail Vape Tax as Tobacco Tax Revenue Falls 47% From 2008
Arizona Turns to a 50% Retail Vape Tax as Tobacco Tax Revenue Falls 47% From 2008
Arizona's First Things First is pushing for an excise tax equal to 50% of the retail price of vaping products, estimating that the measure could generate about $100 million annually. The agency says its tobacco-tax revenue has fallen 47% from 2008 levels. Arizona has attempted to broaden its nicotine tax base in each of the past two years: a 2025 bill proposed a 50% wholesale-price tax, while a 2026 measure shifted to a 50% retail-price tax covering alternative nicotine products and vapor products. Separately, the state enacted HB 4001 this year to establish a new licensing and sales framework for alternative nicotine products.
Sep.21