Ohio City Lawsuit Challenges State Tobacco Sales Restrictions as Unconstitutional

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Apr.11.2024
Ohio City Lawsuit Challenges State Tobacco Sales Restrictions as Unconstitutional
Ohio cities, including Columbus and Cincinnati, are suing the state over tobacco sales restrictions violating local autonomy.

According to a report by halfwheel on April 10th, earlier this year, the Ohio State Legislature passed a bill that will restrict the sale of tobacco products, including flavored tobacco, within city limits, and prohibit municipalities from implementing tobacco regulations stricter than those set by the state.

 

Subsequently, 14 cities, including Columbus, Bexley, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Dublin, Gahanna, Grandview Heights, Heath, Hilliard, Oxford, Reynoldsburg, Upper Arlington, and Worthington, filed lawsuits against the new law. They filed the lawsuits in Franklin County on Tuesday, April 9, alleging that the law violates the local government's autonomy. In particular, they argued that the constitution explicitly states that cities have the power to "exercise all local self-government powers and to enact and enforce within their limits such local police, sanitary and other similar regulations, not in conflict with general laws." They contend that this ban would have a negative impact on citizens.

 

The incident began in December 2022 when the Columbus City Council proposed a ban on the sale of flavored tobacco products. The flavor tobacco ban went into effect on January 1, prohibiting the sale of fruit-flavored, candy-flavored, vanilla-flavored, mint-flavored, or menthol-flavored e-cigarettes, cigarettes, small cigars, chewing tobacco, and any other flavored tobacco products. The Ohio state legislature, controlled by Republicans, quickly passed a priority law prohibiting municipalities from implementing tobacco regulations stricter than state law, which was then vetoed by Governor Mike DeWine. The ban was subsequently passed again by the state legislature, this time as part of a budget proposal, and once again vetoed by DeWine. In January of this year, the state Senate overturned Governor Mike DeWine's veto.

 

With the veto in place, the new state law will go into effect on April 24, meaning cities like Columbus will no longer be able to enforce their ban on flavored tobacco sales after that date.

 

Columbus City Attorney Zach Klein stated in a press release, "Depriving cities of the right to make decisions in the interest of residents is not only unconstitutional, but also harmful policy that undermines public health, disrupts our progress in reducing tobacco use, and keeps these products out of the hands of youth."

 

At the same time, these cities argue that the law also threatens tobacco sales age restrictions that differ from those set by the state. In recent years, cities such as Columbus, Reynoldsburg, and others in central Ohio have passed ordinances to restrict tobacco sales to those aged 21 and older. According to data from the Ohio Department of Health, the smoking rate among adults in Franklin County decreased by 14% from 2016 to 2020, while tobacco use, especially e-cigarette use, has surged among teenagers statewide.

 

These cities have requested the state court to issue a temporary restraining order on the legislation to prevent the statewide ban from taking effect on April 23rd.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Ohio Supreme Court takes up appeal that could define state limits on illegal vape sales enforcement
Ohio Supreme Court takes up appeal that could define state limits on illegal vape sales enforcement
The Ohio Supreme Court has agreed to hear Attorney General Dave Yost’s appeal seeking to revive lawsuits against three Ohio vape retailers. Lower courts dismissed the cases, finding that federal law governs whether vaping products may be marketed and sold.
Mar.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Belarus Official Says Full Vape Ban Is Not Advisable Due to Supply Risks From Russia
Belarus Official Says Full Vape Ban Is Not Advisable Due to Supply Risks From Russia
A Belarusian Interior Ministry official said on March 18 at a press conference on preventing dependence on electronic smoking systems that a full ban on vapes is not appropriate in Belarus at this stage.
Mar.19 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Sesh Launches 200-Pouch Refill Bag, Expanding Retail Unit Size in U.S. Nicotine Pouch Market
Sesh Launches 200-Pouch Refill Bag, Expanding Retail Unit Size in U.S. Nicotine Pouch Market
According to a LinkedIn post published by Sesh CMO Josh Metz on February 25, 2026, Sesh Products has introduced a 200-pouch nicotine pouch refill bag sold with a reusable metal can. In a U.S. MO market dominated by 20-pouch plastic cans, the product offers a larger retail unit size. The company lists a standard price of USD 49.99, with a uniform 15% discount currently applied, bringing the price to USD 42.49.
Innovation
Feb.25
Smoore, Distributors Move to Toss Cannabis Vape Price-Fixing Suit
Smoore, Distributors Move to Toss Cannabis Vape Price-Fixing Suit
Several vape manufacturers and distributors, including Shenzhen Smoore Technology Co. Ltd., Smoore International Holdings, 3Win Corp., Jupiter Research LLC, Canna Brand Solutions, and Greenlane Holdings Inc., have filed motions seeking dismissal of consumer claims in consolidated antitrust litigation in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
Events
Feb.24
UK Vape Waste Falls 23% From 2024, but Recycling Group Says Fire Risks Remain High
UK Vape Waste Falls 23% From 2024, but Recycling Group Says Fire Risks Remain High
New research from UK recycling campaign group Material Focus says more than 6.3 million vapes and pods are still thrown away each week in the UK. The figure is down 23% from 8.2 million in 2024, which the group said suggests the June 2025 single-use vape ban has helped reduce waste, but it warned that the current level still represents a major waste of valuable materials and a significant fire risk.
Mar.27 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Cambodia Siem Reap raid seizes over 10,000 e-cigarette items; two arrested
Cambodia Siem Reap raid seizes over 10,000 e-cigarette items; two arrested
Police in Siem Reap, Cambodia, seized 10,168 items of e-cigarette paraphernalia during a raid on February 28, 2026, and arrested two suspected sellers and owners of the premises.
Mar.03 by 2FIRSTS.ai