Striving to Regulate E-Cigarette and Tobacco Shops in Ohio Town

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Feb.22.2024
Striving to Regulate E-Cigarette and Tobacco Shops in Ohio Town
Brunswick City in Ohio is struggling to control the distribution of e-cigarette and tobacco stores within the area.

Recently, according to reports from American media outlet News5Cleveland, the city of Brunswick in the state of Ohio is working to regulate the distribution of vape shops or tobacco specialty shops within the city limits. The city government had initially planned to require these shops to obtain a "tobacco retail license," but this plan has been temporarily put on hold.

 

Within a five-mile radius of Brunswick City, there are more than five e-cigarette and tobacco shops. For Deputy Mayor and City Council Chairman Nicholas Hanek, the number of these stores is excessive and their distribution is too dense. "We have never seen so many e-cigarette shops popping up everywhere, it's truly unbelievable," Hanek said.

 

Hanek is concerned that these stores may be illegally selling products to underage users, despite e-cigarette stores and tobacco products being legally sold. Starting in 2019, tobacco users in Ohio must be at least 21 years old. "We have an epidemic of underage smoking in Ohio," said Hanek.

 

In order to prevent the sale of tobacco to minors, the Brunswick City Council enacted an ordinance requiring e-cigarette stores to obtain a "tobacco retail license" through the health department of MacDenna County. However, the ordinance was quickly put on hold after state legislators overturned Governor DeWain's veto.

 

Due to legal uncertainties, the city of Brunswick is now turning to zoning planning methods. The new legislation will require new e-cigarette or tobacco stores to be located a certain distance away from schools, churches, and playgrounds. These stores also cannot be opened within 1000 feet of existing stores.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Legal Analysis: Why SKE Lost the “CRYSTAL BAR” Trademark Case and Key Takeaways
Legal Analysis: Why SKE Lost the “CRYSTAL BAR” Trademark Case and Key Takeaways
Attorney Liu Peiling analyzed SKE’s loss in the “CRYSTAL BAR” trademark case, highlighting the UK’s “first-to-file” principle and common pitfalls in Chinese firms’ overseas IP strategies, such as delayed registration and weak evidence. She urged Chinese brands to plan trademark filings early and improve evidence retention to avoid disputes and protect their rights.
Jul.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Philippine Police Seize $800,000 Worth of Illegal Vapes, Including Spark Lighting and Elite 15000
Philippine Police Seize $800,000 Worth of Illegal Vapes, Including Spark Lighting and Elite 15000
On July 10, the Philippine Criminal Investigation and Detection Group (CIDG), together with the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), seized unregistered e-cigarette products worth approximately PHP 45 million (around USD 800,000) in Bulacan province and arrested two suspects.
Jul.14 by 2FIRSTS.ai
US Report: Americans Discard 500,000 Disposable E-Cigarettes Daily, Nearly $100 Million Lost Annually
US Report: Americans Discard 500,000 Disposable E-Cigarettes Daily, Nearly $100 Million Lost Annually
A PIRG report shows Americans throw away nearly 500,000 disposable e-cigarettes daily, or 5.7 every second. The devices, made of non-recyclable plastic and containing toxins, harm the environment and cause $95 million in annual waste facility fire damages. Some states have banned sales, but experts urge a nationwide ban.
Jul.17 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Türkiye designates Artvin Province as a "smoke-free city" pilot, strictly controlling tobacco and e-cigarettes
Türkiye designates Artvin Province as a "smoke-free city" pilot, strictly controlling tobacco and e-cigarettes
Turkey's Artvin province implements full smoking ban in public institutions, provides quitting support, and tightly regulates e-cigarettes.
Aug.20 by 2FIRSTS.ai
US E-cigarette Industry Sues North Carolina Over FDA Authorization Law, Claims State Overreach in Federal Regulation
US E-cigarette Industry Sues North Carolina Over FDA Authorization Law, Claims State Overreach in Federal Regulation
U.S. e-cigarette industry sues North Carolina over FDA unauthorized sales ban, alleging overreach in federal regulation interference.
Aug.13 by 2FIRSTS.ai
U.S. Vape Firms Urge Federal Court to Block North Carolina’s New Rules, Citing Unconstitutionality and Business Threats
U.S. Vape Firms Urge Federal Court to Block North Carolina’s New Rules, Citing Unconstitutionality and Business Threats
Vape groups asked the U.S. Fourth Circuit to block a North Carolina law they say, pushed by Reynolds American, threatens quit-smoking products and violates federal authority under the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause.
Jul.16 by 2FIRSTS.ai