Belarus to Conduct Public Discussion on Tobacco Regulations Law

Jan.02.2025
Belarus to Conduct Public Discussion on Tobacco Regulations Law
Belarus to hold public discussion on new tobacco and e-cigarette law, including definitions, regulations, and import rights.

According to BELTA reports on December 31, from December 31, 2024, to January 9, 2025, Belarus will hold a public discussion on the "Law on the Production, Distribution, and Consumption of Tobacco Raw Materials, Tobacco Products, Non-Tobacco Nicotine-Containing Products, e-cigarette liquid, e-cigarettes, and e-cigarette products".


The bill introduced a definition for these products while removing the definition for "summer platform (extension)." The bill also grants the President of Belarus the authority to establish special laws and regulations, and clarifies the legal entities involved in tobacco trade activities, including legal persons and individual enterprises. At the same time, the country will retain exclusive rights for the import of tobacco raw materials and products.


In addition, the bill establishes licensing measures related to the trade of tobacco products, specifies registration requirements for the production equipment of tobacco products and related devices, sets various quality and safety standards, and outlines requirements for packaging information and tax stamp labeling.


The public discussion is organized by the Belarusian National Food Industry Group. The public can provide opinions and suggestions from December 31, 2024 to January 9, 2025.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

China Caps E-Cigarette Capacity and Requires Export Compliance Proof to Curb “Involution”
China Caps E-Cigarette Capacity and Requires Export Compliance Proof to Curb “Involution”
China’s top tobacco regulator has issued a directive aimed at preventing excess capacity and curbing “involution-style” competition in the e-cigarette sector. The notice tightens investment controls, formalizes verified capacity management and requires exporters to submit compliance proof for destination markets, signaling a push toward higher industry concentration and stricter cross-border oversight.
Special Report
Feb.13
Shanghai releases 2025 smoke-free white paper: smoking incidence at designated smoke-free venues falls to 12.6%
Shanghai releases 2025 smoke-free white paper: smoking incidence at designated smoke-free venues falls to 12.6%
Shanghai released its 2025 White Paper on Smoking Control in Public Places at a city tobacco control meeting on March 5. The paper reports a 12.6% smoking incidence in legally designated smoke-free venues, down 0.4 percentage points from 2024, and says 98.2% of residents support a full indoor smoking ban.
Mar.05
U.S. Company Seeks Cancellation of “Lost Mary” Vape Trademark
U.S. Company Seeks Cancellation of “Lost Mary” Vape Trademark
North Carolina hemp provider JLT Imports Inc. has filed suit in California federal court seeking cancellation of the “Lost Mary” vape trademark held by Chinese company Imiracle (HK) Ltd.
Mar.30 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Poland Weighs Ban on Disposable Vapes, Tightens Rules on Nicotine Pouches
Poland Weighs Ban on Disposable Vapes, Tightens Rules on Nicotine Pouches
Poland plans to amend its tobacco control legislation, proposing a ban on disposable e-cigarettes (both nicotine-containing and nicotine-free) while simultaneously tightening regulations on nicotine pouches and other novel nicotine products. Nicotine pouches may be permitted only in "tobacco flavour" variants to reduce their appeal to young people.
Mar.10 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Michigan Proposes 57% Vape Tax in $800M Revenue Plan
Michigan Proposes 57% Vape Tax in $800M Revenue Plan
Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer’s FY2027 executive budget proposes a new 57% wholesale tax on vaping products and oral nicotine items as part of a broader $800 million revenue package aimed at stabilizing Medicaid funding.
Regulations
Feb.23
Small ENDS Manufacturers Press FDA on Abuse Liability Standards as Agency Defines Pharmacological Review Framework
Small ENDS Manufacturers Press FDA on Abuse Liability Standards as Agency Defines Pharmacological Review Framework
At the third session of its PMTA roundtable, the FDA outlined its framework for assessing abuse liability in ENDS products, emphasizing the role of nicotine pharmacokinetics and product-specific data in APPH determinations. Small manufacturers questioned the high cost of clinical PK studies and the absence of defined numeric thresholds, while raising bridging strategies and PBPK modeling as potential alternatives.
Feb.11