Settlement Reached in Trademark Dispute Between BBK and Olympic Reef

Mar.07
Settlement Reached in Trademark Dispute Between BBK and Olympic Reef
BBK Tobacco & Foods LLP and Olympic Reef LLC settle "Juicy" trademark dispute in Arizona federal court.

Main highlights:

1.US tobacco products retailer BBK Tobacco & Foods LLP has reached a settlement with cannabis producer Olympic Reef LLC over the trademark dispute of "Juicy".

2.The US Federal Court has approved the dismissal of the case, with the details of the settlement undisclosed.


According to Tobacco Reporter on March 5th, the American tobacco product retailer BBK Tobacco & Foods LLP and a cannabis producer Olympic Reef LLC submitted a notice to the federal court in Arizona on Monday (the 3rd), announcing that they have reached a settlement in the trademark lawsuit involving the "Juicy" product.

 

BBK has registered the trademark "Juicy" since 2006, and in 2020 revised the trademark for use on their rolling papers and smoking pipes, among other products. According to the lawsuit, Olympic Reef is using the word "Juicy" and related combinations such as "Juicy Joints," "Super Juicy's," and "CBD Juicy Joints" on some products, potentially causing confusion in the market.

 

United States District Judge David G. Campbell signed an order on Thursday canceling a scheduled case management conference for Wednesday (the 5th) and ordering the case to be dismissed within 30 days of the order. Details of the settlement were not made public.

 

BBK Tobacco & Foods LLP is a distributor and retailer of tobacco-related products in the United States, while Olympic Reef LLC is a marijuana producer and processor based in Washington state.

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

NJOY Sues FDA Over Delayed Ruling on Flavored Disposable Vapes
NJOY Sues FDA Over Delayed Ruling on Flavored Disposable Vapes
Altria’s subsidiary NJOY has sued the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), alleging prolonged delays in ruling on its appeal for flavored disposable vapes. NJOY argues the products are identical to authorized versions and backed by scientific data and safeguards, yet the review has taken far beyond statutory limits, blocking lawful products while illicit ones flood the market.
Aug.24
Alabama Senator Proposes Expansion of Clean Indoor Air Act to Include E-Cigarettes
Alabama Senator Proposes Expansion of Clean Indoor Air Act to Include E-Cigarettes
A Republican senator in Alabama has introduced a bill to extend the state’s smoking ban to e-cigarettes, prohibiting their use in restaurants, malls, and other enclosed public spaces. Violators would face a $25 fine. The proposal also seeks to rename the legislation in honor of a Democratic lawmaker who played a key role in advancing the original anti-smoking law.
Aug.12 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Customs Officers Seize Large Shipment of Illegal Chinese Vapes in Sofia, Bulgaria
Customs Officers Seize Large Shipment of Illegal Chinese Vapes in Sofia, Bulgaria
Authorities in Sofia have seized 2,800 illegal disposable vapes, each containing 15ml of liquid—a total of 42,000ml—during an inspection at a logistics warehouse. The products, imported from China and disguised as waterproof sprays, far exceeded legal limits under Bulgarian law.
Aug.22 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Portsmouth,UK crackdown seizes 83,000 illegal cigarettes and e-cigarette products
Portsmouth,UK crackdown seizes 83,000 illegal cigarettes and e-cigarette products
Portsmouth cracks down on illegal tobacco, seizing 83,000 cigarettes to protect community health and safety, with support from local officials.
Aug.13 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Thai Police Raid Illegal Vape Operation, Seize Over 20,000 Products
Thai Police Raid Illegal Vape Operation, Seize Over 20,000 Products
On July 29, Thai police raided an apartment in Bangkok and seized over 20,000 illegal vape components, including more than 1,000 pods and a large quantity of e-liquid.
Aug.01 by 2FIRSTS.ai
U.S. Vape Firms Urge Federal Court to Block North Carolina’s New Rules, Citing Unconstitutionality and Business Threats
U.S. Vape Firms Urge Federal Court to Block North Carolina’s New Rules, Citing Unconstitutionality and Business Threats
Vape groups asked the U.S. Fourth Circuit to block a North Carolina law they say, pushed by Reynolds American, threatens quit-smoking products and violates federal authority under the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause.
Jul.16 by 2FIRSTS.ai